Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55Charities may be liable for accidents that happen to volunteers during their work. However, there are limits to this, as the Supreme Court ruled on 24 December 2021. What are these limits?
A beautifully lit Christmas tree in a village brings even more Christmas atmosphere to a dark winter. This was also the opinion of the village council of Hunsel in Limburg. It therefore decided to take on the responsibility of placing the tree itself when the municipality stopped this tradition in 2011. The village council entrusted the placing of the tree to the Speelruimte Foundation, that ran the local playground.
In 2013, things went completely wrong. The six-metre Christmas tree stood in a front garden and had yet to be cut down by the foundation’s volunteers. To prevent damage to house, fence and garden shed, a rope had to be attached to the tree. An aerial work platform had been brought along for this purpose, but it did not fit in the small garden. A ladder was still in the playground, over 600 metres away. Moreover, it had started to rain. Thus, an eager volunteer climbed the tree himself to attach the rope. However at 3.5 metres, he fell from the tree onto the garden shed and suffered paraplegia.
Is the volunteer entitled to damages? Or is he the victim of his own initiative?
According to the District Court, the volunteer had to pay for his damage. He therefore lodged an appeal. In the appeal, he held the Speelruimte Foundation liable as the commissioning party. According to the Court of Appeal, however, the foundation had not given any assignment to the volunteers. After all, the victim was free not to participate in the Christmas action. In addition, the volunteers had divided the tasks on their own initiative. And that own initiative was precisely what had led to the accident. Therefore, there was no question of invoking employer’s liability, whereby the employer is in principle liable for accidents at work.
Still, the foundation was liable. It knew that a six-metre Christmas tree had to be cut down. It is obvious that this can cause danger, especially, in a crowded, small garden. That the volunteers did not have the necessary qualifications for the job is also clear. Therefore, the foundation had a duty of care and it had not fulfilled this duty. The fact that the foundation itself also consisted of volunteers did not change this. It should have given directions, which it did not do. The correct materials were also missing: the aerial work platform did not fit in the garden and the ladder was still in the playground.
However, the volunteer was also to blame. He had climbed the tree on his own initiative, because he did not want to wait for the ladder to be fetched due to the rain. In the end, this led to the judgment that the Speelruimte Foundation was liable for 75% and the unfortunate volunteer for 25%.
The ruling of the Court of Appeal was confirmed in cassation by the Supreme Court. Unfortunately, without explanation. However, in his advice to the Supreme Court the Advocate-General did summarize in what situations the statutory regulation for employer’s liability applies to commissioning parties of volunteers:
All three of these conditions must be met. In addition, normal liability also applies when working with volunteers. But the threshold for this is higher than for employer’s liability.
Are you a director of an organisation with volunteers and is your organisation held liable? Or are you yourself held liable as a director and are looking for legal assistance? We have extensive experience in supporting charities and will be happy to assist you. Please contact:
European regulatory developments are introducing major new obligations for companies in the retail, fashion and luxury sectors. Companies must prepare their compliance processes accordingly.
A new law stipulates that self-employed persons earning less than 38 euros per hour are, in principle, deemed to be employees. What does this mean for contractors and their clients? What exceptions might there be to this legal presumption based on an hourly rate?
The statutory minimum hourly wage changes every six months. What are the new amounts as of 1 July 2026?
Employees have a right to privacy in their private lives. This also applies to sick employees. However, they must also comply with their reintegration obligations and provide accurate information about their illness. What options does the employer have to check whether they are actually doing this?
Can you dismiss your employee with immediate effect after a minor offence, such as the theft of a (very) low-value product? Yes, you can! However, a recently published decision shows it does not go without a risk!
Under the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Prevention) Act (Wwft), banks may be obliged to refuse a customer or terminate their relationship with them. This can also happen to charities. When is a bank permitted to terminate the relationship? And must a customer cooperate with a bank’s investigation?
