Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55When is a tenant entitled to rent reduction? How are the consequences of the coronavirus crisis shared between landlord and tenant?
Courts have frequently dealt with the question whether the coronavirus crisis entitles the tenant of retail, catering or commercial premises to rent reduction. As a matter of fact, this may actually be the case. Several courts have established that tenants and landlords were not able to foresee the lockdown when concluding the tenancy agreement.
Even though it has been established that the coronavirus crisis is an unforeseen circumstance, it has to be assessed whether the circumstances have changed in such a way that the landlord must agree with a temporary rent reduction in accordance with the criteria of reasonableness and fairness.
The unforeseen circumstance of the coronavirus crisis can involve that it is not reasonable to stick to the agreement that the landlord is entitled to payment of the entire rent. The coronavirus crisis and the government measures created an imbalance in tenancy agreements. For this reason, landlord and tenant must share the pain fairly. But when is there a fair distribution?
Courts choose different ways to reach a fair distribution of the pain between tenant and landlord. A frequently chosen solution is to take the decrease in the turnover as a starting point and to equally distribute the consequences between the parties. The percentage of the rent reduction then equals half the percentage of the decrease in turnover. With a decrease in turnover of 100%, the percentage of the rent reduction is 50%.
However, the pain of the decrease in turnover is also relieved by government measures, such as the Allowance for Fixed Costs (Tegemoetkoming Vaste Lasten; TVL). This does expressly include the rent of retail and commercial premises. When determining the amount of the rent reduction, courts sometimes take into account the income from this scheme. The NOW-scheme is not included, as this allowance is only meant to be a compensation for wage costs.
Conclusion
It is not correct that the tenant only has to pay part of the rent in the event of decrease in turnover due to the coronavirus crisis. Many courts consider the coronavirus crisis an unforeseen circumstance, but the circumstances can differ from case to case. For example, think of the measures to compensate decrease in turnover. Hoewver, if a request for rent reduction is made, this must be substantially motivated and submitted to the court.
Do you want to know whether a request for rent reduction will be successful or whether your tenant is right to ask for this? We will be happy to provide you with advice. And we are also happy to assist you in other disputes concerning real estate and rent. Please contact us:
It will become even easier to set up a company in the Netherlands. As from 1 January 2024, this can be done entirely online. What will change?
The WHOA makes it easier for a company facing bankruptcy to avoid bankruptcy. This can be done through a binding agreement with all creditors, even if they do not all agree to the arrangement. What rights do creditors have in WHOA proceedings?
On 12 June 2023, the new EU General Product Safety Regulation entered into force. As of 13 December 2024, products must comply with this regulation. What are the consequences of the new Product Safety Regulation? Which entrepreneurs should start taking measures now?
Buildings may be timeless but every now and then work will have to be carried out in order to prevent decay. Lessees and lessors have different rights and duties, depending on whether the work can be considered as renovation or (urgent) maintenance.
The main difference between 230a and 290 business premises is the minimum term of lease. The longer lease term for 290 business premises gives retail and hospitality businesses more time to recoup their investments. What are the lease terms for the different types of business premises?
Company directors and company owners are more than ever reliant on assets such as a company’s brand name, patented inventions, trade secrets, customer data base and skillful employees. Yet, all too often, when faced with a potential infringement or misappropriation, companies find themselves woefully underprepared in terms of risk management. This may prove highly detrimental to the company’s best interests.
