Publication date: 10 October 2018
The provenance research regarding looted art in Dutch museums has been largely completed. What are the results and how can you, as a heir, submit a claim?
The project “Museale verwervingen na 1933” (Museum acquisitions after 1933) has largely been completed. Research was carried out regarding the provenance of collections of all museums, except for the Rijksmuseum. As a result, the provenance of van 170 objects is suspicious, according to Dutch media nu.nl and Trouw.
What can heirs do if they have a claim to one of these 170 objects? First of all, they can contact the museum about the possibility of restitution or whether justice regarding their property can be done any other way. Regarding national museums, a request will have to be made to the Minister of Education, Culture and Science. To non-national museums applies that if parties will not be able to come to an agreement, the issue must be presented to the Restitution Committee for binding advice. Such requests have to be well-substantiated, of course. Russell Advocaten has vast experience with such requests and will gladly be of service to you and help you submit a well-founded request with a reasonable chance to reach a result.
One of the museums that has recently carried out provenance research of its collection is the Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen. It turned out that it has about 30 suspicious objects, six of which have been returned. One of these “returned” art works – which is specifically mentioned in the article in Trouw – is the drawing “Faith in God” by Jan Toorop. Thanks to the commitment of Russell Advocaten it was returned to the heirs of the original Jewish owners, Ernst and Gertrude Flersheim, well before the museum had started to check its collection. In the restitution of another work by Jan Toorop that was among the collection of Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, “De Theems”, we also successfully assisted the heirs Flersheim in the proceedings before the Restitution Committee.
In response to the research, the Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen organises an exhibition regarding the fates of the museum during the years 1935 to 1958 from 13 October 2018 up to and including 27 January 2019.
Would you like to learn more about looted art and the possibilities for restitution? Do you have a claim or are you looking for assistance to submit it? Or do you have any other questions regarding art and law? Please contact us:
Russell Advocaten has for the 17th consecutive year in a row been included in The Legal 500. We are pleased with the recognition for the quality of our legal services by experts and clients. Please read what they say about us:read on
The Dutch restitution policy returns to its original principles and is rightly becoming more generous. Cases that have already been settled can also be resubmitted. What will change in the policy?read on
The sale of a drawing by Rubens, owned by Princess Christina, at an auction in New York caused great indignation and a discussion about the policy for cultural heritage in the Netherlands. This resulted in two advice committees, the Pechtold Committee and the Buma Committee. The latter has issued an interim opinion, that, if adopted, could have serious consequences for art collectors and art dealers in the Netherlands.read on
Russell Advocaten noticed in its proceedings before the Dutch Restitutions Committee that the committee increasingly attached importance to the interest of the current owners. This is contrary to the Washington Principles. The committee appointed to evaluate Dutch restitution policy agrees with us in its “Striving for Justice” report.read on
Even if the Restitutions Committee recommends to return looted art, it is not certain that the work of art will actually return to its rightful claimants. It could be that the work of art is irreplaceable and indispensable to Dutch cultural heritage and may not leave the Netherlands.read on
At the online symposium of the Vereniging Kunst Cultuur Recht on the Heritage Act and the protection of cultural goods, Paul W.L. Russell, LL.M. threw a few stones into the pond. How useful are protective measures to keep cultural heritage in the Netherlands without making underlying purchase funds directly available? Is the designation procedure necessary?read on