Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55It seems a safe choice to distribute risk with group companies. Therefore, the disadvantages are likely to be overlooked. Through group companies you will not only limit liability but also claims to third parties. So what do you have to look out for?
Private limited companies (BVs) and Public limited companies (NVs) are well-suited to limit the risk of the entrepreneur. As the company bears its own rights and obligations, the management (and shareholders) are not directly liable for potential debts. Through group companies the risk can be limited even further. Several companies will be established, each performing its own activities. Often they are led by or “hooked to” a parent company. If, for instance, one company of the group will go bankrupt, the other companies of the group will not automatically go bankrupt either.
However, group companies do not only have advantages. For example, great care is required in group financing and issuing and revoking “403 statements”. It is often overlooked that there are also risks involved if group companies contract. The different companies often work in close cooperation, for instance when concluding contacts that are relevant for several companies of the group. Often, one company will be the contracting party and this company will, in principle, be the only one entitled to address the other party regarding its obligations under the contract.
In a recent case before the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal, within a group, company A had bought tubes that company B had used in housing construction. After company A had gone bankrupt, company B wanted to address the seller because the tubes were defective. Though the seller had sent the invoices to company B and the materials had been supplied there too, according to the Court of Appeal, company B had not been involved sufficiently close in the performance of the contract. Only company A had acted as a party to the contract and company B had no opportunity to recover the damage from the seller.
Conversely, confusion can arise when several companies of the group are involved in the formation of a contract. Who are the contracting parties? The Amsterdam District Court ruled that the companies involved have the responsibility to dispel the confusion of the other party as quickly as possible. If they don’t do so, all companies of the group may be considered as contracting parties and will therefore be obliged to fulfil the contract.
Would you like to get more information about the possibilities of spreading risk when contracting through group companies? Or do you have any other questions concerning contracts and liability, please contact us:
A maioria das relações comerciais transcorre sem problemas. As mercadorias são entregues, os serviços são prestados e as faturas são pagas em dia. Ocasionalmente, porém, um cliente ou parceiro comercial deixa de pagar. O que um credor pode fazer nessa situação?
Quando um devedor se recusa a pagar, apesar de lembretes e cartas de cobrança, medidas mais enérgicas serão necessárias para garantir o crédito. Um dos instrumentos mais eficazes na cobrança de dívidas na Holanda é a penhora. Como um credor pode obter tal penhora?
Quando um credor estrangeiro tem uma dívida a receber de um devedor holandês, o processo de cobrança de dívidas envolve considerações jurídicas adicionais, que vão desde questões de jurisdição até a executabilidade de sentenças estrangeiras e a disponibilidade de instrumentos de execução transfronteiriça. Quais são as opções de um credor em um contexto internacional?
Quando um devedor se recusa a pagar faturas pendentes, apesar de repetidos avisos, cartas de cobrança e até mesmo propostas de acordo, os credores podem começar a buscar medidas mais contundentes. Uma opção prevista na legislação holandesa é a apresentação de um pedido de falência contra o devedor. Quando pode um credor recorrer a essa opção, e quais são os riscos envolvidos?
This newsletter highlights the key developments in EU law and their practical implications for the aviation sector.
When a debtor refuses to pay outstanding invoices, despite repeated reminders, demand letters and even settlement proposals, creditors may start looking for stronger measures. One option under Dutch law is filing a bankruptcy petition against the debtor. When can a creditor use this option, and what are the risks involved?
