Reinier Russell

managing partner

Reinier advises national and international companies

reinier.russell@russell.nl
+31 20 301 55 55

Group companies: The risks involved in spreading risk

Publication date 26 May 2016

It seems a safe choice to distribute risk with group companies. Therefore, the disadvantages are likely to be overlooked. Through group companies you will not only limit liability but also claims to third parties. So what do you have to look out for?

struisvogels-groep.6a81ea

Group companies and risk distribution

Private limited companies (BVs) and Public limited companies (NVs) are well-suited to limit the risk of the entrepreneur. As the company bears its own rights and obligations, the management (and shareholders) are not directly liable for potential debts. Through group companies the risk can be limited even further. Several companies will be established, each performing its own activities. Often they are led by or “hooked to” a parent company. If, for instance, one company of the group will go bankrupt, the other companies of the group will not automatically go bankrupt either.

“Each advantage has its disadvantage”

However, group companies do not only have advantages. For example, great care is required in group financing and issuing and revoking “403 statements”. It is often overlooked that there are also risks involved if group companies contract. The different companies often work in close cooperation, for instance when concluding contacts that are relevant for several companies of the group. Often, one company will be the contracting party and this company will, in principle, be the only one entitled to address the other party regarding its obligations under the contract.

How it can go wrong

In a recent case before the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal, within a group, company A had bought tubes that company B had used in housing construction. After company A had gone bankrupt, company B wanted to address the seller because the tubes were defective. Though the seller had sent the invoices to company B and the materials had been supplied there too, according to the Court of Appeal, company B had not been involved sufficiently close in the performance of the contract. Only company A had acted as a party to the contract and company B had no opportunity to recover the damage from the seller.

Conversely, confusion can arise when several companies of the group are involved in the formation of a contract. Who are the contracting parties? The Amsterdam District Court ruled that the companies involved have the responsibility to dispel the confusion of the other party as quickly as possible. If they don’t do so, all companies of the group may be considered as contracting parties and will therefore be obliged to fulfil the contract.

Action

  • Use group companies to distribute risk within the group.
  • Be aware that when contracting through group companies the means of recovery available against the other party are limited.
  • Prevent surprises afterwards and decide per contract which companies of the group will (have to) be involved and make this clear to the other party.
  • Obtain legal advice to achieve an optimal distribution of liability and claims.

More information

Would you like to get more information about the possibilities of spreading risk when contracting through group companies? Or do you have any other questions concerning contracts and liability, please contact us:

    We process the personal data above with your permission. You can withdraw your permission at any time. For more information please see our Privacy Statement.

    Related publications

    Wwft: issues with bank accounts for charities and associations

    Under the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Prevention) Act (Wwft), banks may be obliged to refuse a customer or terminate their relationship with them. This can also happen to charities. When is a bank permitted to terminate the relationship? And must a customer cooperate with a bank’s investigation?

    Read more

    Wtmo: new transparency rules for donations to non-profit organisations

    The Transparency and Countering Undermining by Civil Society Organisations Act (Wtmo) imposed a number of new obligations on charities in the Netherlands. However, the Act has been rejected by the Dutch Senate on 24 March 2026 and will not enter into force.

    Read more

    Dismissal of a statutory director without just cause: employer ordered to pay EUR 222,000

    Statutory directors enjoy less protection against dismissal, but there must still be reasonable grounds for the dismissal. Otherwise, the employer must pay fair compensation. This can be substantial, as a recent ruling has shown. Why was the employer required to pay this compensation?

    Read more

    Debt recovery in the Netherlands: what to do when a customer does not pay?

    Most business relationships run smoothly. Goods are delivered, services are provided and invoices are paid on time. Occasionally, however, a customer or business partner fails to pay. What can a creditor do in that situation?

    Read more

    The benefits of a works council

    Reinier W.L. Russell, LL.M. has published an article on The benefits of a works council for entrepreneurs in the “Off the record” section of Primerus Weekly on March 3, 2026. Below you will find the text of this article.

    Read more

    Digital General Meeting for Private Law Legal Entities Act adopted

    On 16 December 2025, the House of Representatives of the Netherlands adopted the Digital General Meeting for Private Law Legal Entities Act. This Act makes it possible to hold general meetings entirely digitally. What does this mean for directors and shareholders of private limited companies, public limited companies and other legal entities?

    Read more