Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55Liability for damage can lead to high compensation payments. Is it possible to exclude liability completely, or can it merely be limited? And what measures do you have to take to do so?

This is one of the most common questions we are asked by entrepreneurs. The question is obvious, as liability for damage can lead to high compensation payments. So is it possible to exclude liability completely, or can it merely be limited? And what measures do you have to take to do so?
In contracts you can lay down what you will or won’t be liable for. As it is inefficient to negotiate each contract separately, General Terms and Conditions are an efficient solution for standard limitations.
A clause included in the General Terms and Conditions which limits or excludes liability is called an exoneration clause. An exoneration clause must be drawn up correctly and its content has to be accurate as well. Otherwise, there is a high risk that the clause will not be (fully) valid and thus liability would not be excluded after all.
The requirements for an exoneration clause are (partly) stipulated by law:
In order to assess the validity of an exoneration clause, the Court will not just consider the statutory requirements but also the circumstances of a specific situation. For instance,
An exoneration clause can limit your liability extensively, provided that certain requirements are met. A clause that limits liability to too great an extent can be declared void. By this you will also be held liable for matters you could have excluded.
If you intend to exclude liability, you will have to take the following steps:
In the event an exoneration clause is invoked, check whether all (legal) requirements have been met and if the exoneration clause may be declared void.
Would you like to know more about the exclusion of liability, drafting contracts and/or General Terms and Conditions? Please contact:
Reinier W.L. Russell, LL.M. (reinier.russell@russell.nl).
Quando um devedor se recusa a pagar faturas pendentes, apesar de repetidos avisos, cartas de cobrança e até mesmo propostas de acordo, os credores podem começar a buscar medidas mais contundentes. Uma opção prevista na legislação holandesa é a apresentação de um pedido de falência contra o devedor. Quando pode um credor recorrer a essa opção, e quais são os riscos envolvidos?
A maioria das relações comerciais transcorre sem problemas. As mercadorias são entregues, os serviços são prestados e as faturas são pagas em dia. Ocasionalmente, porém, um cliente ou parceiro comercial deixa de pagar. O que um credor pode fazer nessa situação?
Quando um devedor se recusa a pagar, apesar de lembretes e cartas de cobrança, medidas mais enérgicas serão necessárias para garantir o crédito. Um dos instrumentos mais eficazes na cobrança de dívidas na Holanda é a penhora. Como um credor pode obter tal penhora?
Quando um credor estrangeiro tem uma dívida a receber de um devedor holandês, o processo de cobrança de dívidas envolve considerações jurídicas adicionais, que vão desde questões de jurisdição até a executabilidade de sentenças estrangeiras e a disponibilidade de instrumentos de execução transfronteiriça. Quais são as opções de um credor em um contexto internacional?
This newsletter highlights the key developments in EU law and their practical implications for the aviation sector.
When a debtor refuses to pay outstanding invoices, despite repeated reminders, demand letters and even settlement proposals, creditors may start looking for stronger measures. One option under Dutch law is filing a bankruptcy petition against the debtor. When can a creditor use this option, and what are the risks involved?