Publication date: 8 March 2017
Why is it so important to conclude a sound consignment agreement? In what cases can such an agreement be helpful?
In consignment sales the owner of a work of art appoints an intermediary to sell a work of art at a price previously determined and to then hand over the sales proceeds to the owner. The intermediary (usually an art dealer or other professional) will be reimbursed for this transaction. Generally, the owner hands over the work of art to the intermediary yet without transferring the ownership of it.
Before giving a work of art in consignment however, it is important to conclude a sound consignment agreement in writing with the party the work of art is given in consignment. A consignment agreement might be helpful, for instance, when attachment is levied on an object given in consignment.
If the art dealer to whom you have given a painting in consignment fails to pay his invoices, the creditors will initially levy attachment on the art dealer’s trading stock to settle their claims. This also includes the painting you have given in consignment. Indeed, the bailiff who levies attachment will assume that all artefacts at the art gallery are the property of art dealer.
Subsequently, the third party will proceed to sell the attached painting to settle the claim he has against the art dealer with the proceeds of the sale. What action can you take?
You can have the attachment lifted. After all, the third party does not have a claim on you but on the art dealer. However, you will have to be able to prove that you are the owner of the painting and that the fact that it is at the art gallery does not mean that you have transferred the ownership to the art dealer. You can do so by concluding a written consignment agreement.
Make sure to specify in the consignment agreement not just your ownership of the work of art but also agreements on the following:
This will strengthen your position if an object you have given in consignation is sold at a lower price than previously agreed, if an object you have given in consignment is not sold but not returned either, or in case the art dealer refuses to hand over the sales proceeds.
Would you like to give an object in consignment? We will be happy to draft a consignment agreement on your behalf which clearly shows that you do not transfer the ownership of the said object. Please contact us:
Russell Advocaten has for the 17th consecutive year in a row been included in The Legal 500. We are pleased with the recognition for the quality of our legal services by experts and clients. Please read what they say about us:read on
The Dutch restitution policy returns to its original principles and is rightly becoming more generous. Cases that have already been settled can also be resubmitted. What will change in the policy?read on
The sale of a drawing by Rubens, owned by Princess Christina, at an auction in New York caused great indignation and a discussion about the policy for cultural heritage in the Netherlands. This resulted in two advice committees, the Pechtold Committee and the Buma Committee. The latter has issued an interim opinion, that, if adopted, could have serious consequences for art collectors and art dealers in the Netherlands.read on
Russell Advocaten noticed in its proceedings before the Dutch Restitutions Committee that the committee increasingly attached importance to the interest of the current owners. This is contrary to the Washington Principles. The committee appointed to evaluate Dutch restitution policy agrees with us in its “Striving for Justice” report.read on
Even if the Restitutions Committee recommends to return looted art, it is not certain that the work of art will actually return to its rightful claimants. It could be that the work of art is irreplaceable and indispensable to Dutch cultural heritage and may not leave the Netherlands.read on
At the online symposium of the Vereniging Kunst Cultuur Recht on the Heritage Act and the protection of cultural goods, Paul W.L. Russell, LL.M. threw a few stones into the pond. How useful are protective measures to keep cultural heritage in the Netherlands without making underlying purchase funds directly available? Is the designation procedure necessary?read on