Art and Law: Droit de suite

Publication date: 4 May 2017
When is resale right required to be paid? Who can invoke the droit de suite? Who has to pay? And what is the amount that has to be paid?


When an artist has sold a work of art it might rise significantly in value while the artist was only paid a small price. The European legislator did not consider this reasonable and has therefore introduced resale right (droit de suite). Where the artist formerly only benefitted from the first sale of his work of art, on the basis of the resale right he is now entitled to a percentage of the sales price in each resale.

So when is the resale right required to be paid? Who can invoke resale right? Who has to pay? And what is the amount that has to be paid?


The obligation that part of the sales price must be paid to the artist does not apply to all works of art. Resale right is only due if the following conditions are met:

  • The sale regards originals of graphic or plastic works of art, such as sculptures or paintings.
  • The author has died less than 70 years ago.
  • The sales price is at least EUR 3,000.
  • A professional art dealer, such as an auction house or art gallery, is involved in the sale as seller, buyer or agent.

The artist himself is responsible for the collection of resale right. He must do so within five years after his work of art has been sold. Many artists have outsourced the collection of resale right in the Netherlands to the foundation Pictoright, as it is difficult for individuals to monitor all art sales. Art dealers and auction houses must, in principle, state upon the request of Pictoright which of their transactions are subject to resale right. Pictoright and the artist can request information dating back up to five years.

For whom?

Only the author of the original work of art is entitled to resale right. He is not allowed to transfer the right to another person. When the artist dies, the right will be transferred to his successors. The resale right will cease seventy years after his death.

However, not all artists are entitled to droit de suite in the Netherlands. Only EEA citizens and citizens of countries with a droit-de-suite-regime for citizens of EEA countries and artists having their usual place of residence in the Netherlands can invoke resale right.

By whom?

The professional art dealer involved in the sale has to pay the resale right even if other art dealers are engaged. In auction sales, both the auction house and the art dealer have to pay the full amount.

Level of compensation?

The compensation is calculated as a percentage of the sales price according to the following scale:

 Part of the sales price (excl. VAT)

 Resale right percentage

 Up to and including EUR 50,000.- 4 %
 EUR 50,000.01 up to and incl. EUR 200,000 3 %
 EUR 200,000.01 up to and incl. EUR 350,000 1 %
 EUR 350,000.01 up to and incl. EUR 500,000 0.5 %
 Over EUR 500,000 0.25 %

The maximum compensation is EUR 12,500.

Tip for art dealers and auction houses

Resale right can be charged to the buyer or seller separately or included in the service fees or commission. If the art dealer does not negotiate this, he will have to pay the resale right himself.

More information

Would you like to learn more about the droit de suite? Would you like to know what you have to keep in mind when (re)selling of works of art? Or do you have any other questions regarding to art and law? Please contact Russell Advocaten:

    Share on social media

    • Art
    • Employment law and dismissal

    Russell Advocaten recommended by The Legal 500 2021

    20 April 2021

    Russell Advocaten has for the 17th consecutive year in a row been included in The Legal 500. We are pleased with the recognition for the quality of our legal services by experts and clients. Please read what they say about us:

    read on
    • Art

    New rules restitution policy also apply to old cases

    30 March 2021

    The Dutch restitution policy returns to its original principles and is rightly becoming more generous. Cases that have already been settled can also be resubmitted. What will change in the policy?

    read on
    • Art

    Proposals of Buma Committee not sufficient for the protection of Dutch cultural heritage

    3 March 2021

    The sale of a drawing by Rubens, owned by Princess Christina, at an auction in New York caused great indignation and a discussion about the policy for cultural heritage in the Netherlands. This resulted in two advice committees, the Pechtold Committee and the Buma Committee. The latter has issued an interim opinion, that, if adopted, could have serious consequences for art collectors and art dealers in the Netherlands.

    read on
    • Art

    Dutch restitution policy has gone too far in the protection of Netherlands art property

    8 December 2020

    Russell Advocaten noticed in its proceedings before the Dutch Restitutions Committee that the committee increasingly attached importance to the interest of the current owners. This is contrary to the Washington Principles. The committee appointed to evaluate Dutch restitution policy agrees with us in its “Striving for Justice” report.

    read on
    • Art
    • Litigation

    Dutch government can block restitution of Nazi-looted art by designating it a protected cultural object

    4 December 2020

    Even if the Restitutions Committee recommends to return looted art, it is not certain that the work of art will actually return to its rightful claimants. It could be that the work of art is irreplaceable and indispensable to Dutch cultural heritage and may not leave the Netherlands.

    read on
    • Art

    13 November 2020: VKCR-event on the protection of cultural goods and the Heritage Act

    13 November 2020

    At the online symposium of the Vereniging Kunst Cultuur Recht on the Heritage Act and the protection of cultural goods, Paul W.L. Russell, LL.M. threw a few stones into the pond. How useful are protective measures to keep cultural heritage in the Netherlands without making underlying purchase funds directly available? Is the designation procedure necessary?

    read on
    • Art
    • Employment law and dismissal

    Russell Advocaten leading firm in Legal 500 2020

    16 April 2020

    Russell Advocaten has been included in The Legal 500 for the 16th consecutive year. We are pleased with the recognition for the quality of our legal services by experts and clients. Read what they say about us:

    read on
    • Art
    • Contracts

    Rijksmuseum Twenthe pays into a fake bank account. What are the options?

    6 February 2020

    The Rijksmuseum Twenthe paid almost EUR 3 million into a fake bank account. Hackers had taken over the correspondence between the museum and an art dealer on the purchase of a painting by Constable. Who pays for the damage? The museum or the art dealer?

    read on