Publication date: 4 May 2017
When is resale right required to be paid? Who can invoke the droit de suite? Who has to pay? And what is the amount that has to be paid?
When an artist has sold a work of art it might rise significantly in value while the artist was only paid a small price. The European legislator did not consider this reasonable and has therefore introduced resale right (droit de suite). Where the artist formerly only benefitted from the first sale of his work of art, on the basis of the resale right he is now entitled to a percentage of the sales price in each resale.
So when is the resale right required to be paid? Who can invoke resale right? Who has to pay? And what is the amount that has to be paid?
The obligation that part of the sales price must be paid to the artist does not apply to all works of art. Resale right is only due if the following conditions are met:
The artist himself is responsible for the collection of resale right. He must do so within five years after his work of art has been sold. Many artists have outsourced the collection of resale right in the Netherlands to the foundation Pictoright, as it is difficult for individuals to monitor all art sales. Art dealers and auction houses must, in principle, state upon the request of Pictoright which of their transactions are subject to resale right. Pictoright and the artist can request information dating back up to five years.
Only the author of the original work of art is entitled to resale right. He is not allowed to transfer the right to another person. When the artist dies, the right will be transferred to his successors. The resale right will cease seventy years after his death.
However, not all artists are entitled to droit de suite in the Netherlands. Only EEA citizens and citizens of countries with a droit-de-suite-regime for citizens of EEA countries and artists having their usual place of residence in the Netherlands can invoke resale right.
The professional art dealer involved in the sale has to pay the resale right even if other art dealers are engaged. In auction sales, both the auction house and the art dealer have to pay the full amount.
The compensation is calculated as a percentage of the sales price according to the following scale:
Part of the sales price (excl. VAT)
Resale right percentage
|Up to and including EUR 50,000.-||4 %|
|EUR 50,000.01 up to and incl. EUR 200,000||3 %|
|EUR 200,000.01 up to and incl. EUR 350,000||1 %|
|EUR 350,000.01 up to and incl. EUR 500,000||0.5 %|
|Over EUR 500,000||0.25 %|
The maximum compensation is EUR 12,500.
Resale right can be charged to the buyer or seller separately or included in the service fees or commission. If the art dealer does not negotiate this, he will have to pay the resale right himself.
Would you like to learn more about the droit de suite? Would you like to know what you have to keep in mind when (re)selling of works of art? Or do you have any other questions regarding to art and law? Please contact Russell Advocaten:
Russell Advocaten has for the 17th consecutive year in a row been included in The Legal 500. We are pleased with the recognition for the quality of our legal services by experts and clients. Please read what they say about us:read on
The Dutch restitution policy returns to its original principles and is rightly becoming more generous. Cases that have already been settled can also be resubmitted. What will change in the policy?read on
The sale of a drawing by Rubens, owned by Princess Christina, at an auction in New York caused great indignation and a discussion about the policy for cultural heritage in the Netherlands. This resulted in two advice committees, the Pechtold Committee and the Buma Committee. The latter has issued an interim opinion, that, if adopted, could have serious consequences for art collectors and art dealers in the Netherlands.read on
Russell Advocaten noticed in its proceedings before the Dutch Restitutions Committee that the committee increasingly attached importance to the interest of the current owners. This is contrary to the Washington Principles. The committee appointed to evaluate Dutch restitution policy agrees with us in its “Striving for Justice” report.read on
Even if the Restitutions Committee recommends to return looted art, it is not certain that the work of art will actually return to its rightful claimants. It could be that the work of art is irreplaceable and indispensable to Dutch cultural heritage and may not leave the Netherlands.read on
At the online symposium of the Vereniging Kunst Cultuur Recht on the Heritage Act and the protection of cultural goods, Paul W.L. Russell, LL.M. threw a few stones into the pond. How useful are protective measures to keep cultural heritage in the Netherlands without making underlying purchase funds directly available? Is the designation procedure necessary?read on
The Rijksmuseum Twenthe paid almost EUR 3 million into a fake bank account. Hackers had taken over the correspondence between the museum and an art dealer on the purchase of a painting by Constable. Who pays for the damage? The museum or the art dealer?read on