Watch our webinar! “Tricky sickness issues”

Warranties and indemnities in an acquisition agreement

Publication date: 7 June 2018
Regarding the results of this investigation, the seller will usually issue warranties and indemnities in an acquisition agreement. Warranties are provisions a seller issues according to which he ensures that certain general facts and circumstances are true. A breach of these warranties can result in a damage claim. An indemnity relates to a specific risk where the seller will be liable for potential buyer’s damage. In the event of a breach of indemnity, fulfilment can be claimed. Warranties with the wording “according to (the best) of the seller’s knowledge” will ensure risk shifting to the buyer.

onderhandelen contract

Before the acquisition of a company, the buyer often conducts due diligence. Based on these investigations, the buyer will usually request the seller to include warranties and indemnities in the acquisition agreement. What are warranties and indemnities? And what happens if any of these is breached?


Warranties are statements a seller makes according to which particular facts and circumstances are correct. Warranties are of a general, unspecific nature and may apply to different aspects of a company, from personnel to finance. An example of a warranty would be a balance sheet warranty. Here, the seller issues a warranty that the balance and the profit and loss accounts of a certain period are correct.

Warranties are often restricted by disclosures. The seller includes a number of circumstances in the acquisition agreement to which the warranty does not apply. An example for a disclosure would be that warranties do not apply to findings a buyer could have been familiar with according to the due diligence.


An indemnity regards an identified, more specific risk where the seller indemnifies the buyer from damage the buyer might suffer in the event the risk becomes a reality. Thus, indemnities can for instance be issued if a company is involved in legal proceedings. The result of the proceedings is still unknown, but the seller indemnifies the buyer from potential resulting loss.

Indemnities are in fact the mirror image of disclosures and therefore cannot be restricted by them.


If a warranty is breached, the buyer will claim the ensuing damage from the seller. The seller is not likely to admit defeat and shall rely on one of the disclosures. For instance, the buyer could have been aware of a circumstance on the basis of the results of the due diligence.

An acquisition agreement often contains a deadline for the validity of a warranty, and, additionally, a penalty provision for the breach of a warranty will be included.

If nothing has been established with regard to breach of a warranty, the “normal” rules of the Dutch Civil Code will apply. Thus, for instance, fulfilment, termination, and/or damages can be claimed. Termination is usually excluded in acquisition agreements, as reversal of the acquisition is undesirable. It is often difficult to claim fulfilment of a warranty as it has been breached. Therefore, often a claim for damages will be opted for. For this, the buyer must have suffered damage however.

Things are easier when it comes to breach of an indemnity. In this situation the buyer can just claim fulfilment of the indemnity. After all, it was agreed upon in advance that the seller is liable for any damage with regard to the circumstances of the indemnity.

“According to (the best) of the seller’s knowledge”

A seller will try to limit his liability to the greatest possible extent in an acquisition agreement by including the phrase “according to (the best) of the seller’s knowledge” in the warranty conditions. This means, the seller does not issue warranties for circumstances he is not aware of. Unknown circumstances will be at the buyer’s risk. What “seller’s knowledge” refers to is often included in the definitions of the acquisition agreement. As a result, further investigations could have been expected by the seller or that a certain group of people had actual knowledge.

Our advice

Both seller and buyer are well-advised to distinguish between warranties and indemnities in an acquisition agreement. This way it will be clear what the disclosures apply to and which claims can be made in the event of a breach. As a buyer, make sure to observe a warranty with the wording “according to the (best) of the seller’s knowledge”. If necessary, include in the definitions of the acquisition agreement that more detailed research by the seller will be expected.

More information?

Would you like to learn more about warranties and indemnities? Or do you have any other questions regarding a takeover? Please contact Russell Advocaten:

    Share on social media

    • Works Council
    • Corporate law

    Timely consultation of works council before takeover or merger

    3 May 2018

    Business owners have to request the advice of the works council well in advance of a merger or takeover decision. But what exactly does well in advance mean?

    read on
    • Corporate law

    Good governance: The advisory capacity of directors and members of the supervisory board

    28 June 2021

    Directors and members of the supervisory board support shareholders in an advisory capacity. From 1 July 2021 this also applies to directors and supervisory board members of associations, foundations and cooperatives. What are the consequences if the shareholders make decisions disregarding this advisory role?

    read on
    • Franchise, distribution and agency
    • Contracts

    Beware of vague wording in franchise agreements

    24 June 2021

    It is important to use clear and unambiguous language in agreements. This has once again been demonstrated by a recent judgement of the Supreme Court. Because of ambiguities in franchise agreements, franchisees of Albert Heijn may have lost millions.

    read on
    • Works Council
    • Corporate law

    Management and Supervision of Legal Entities Act: What are the changes?

    23 June 2021

    On 10 November 2020, the Dutch Senate adopted the bill on the management and supervision of legal entities. This affects all associations and foundations, but, above all, nonprofit organizations. As an officer of a sports club, are you now more likely to be liable? Do you have to meet additional requirements when you are a member of the supervisory board of a school?

    read on
    • Fashion and luxury
    • Litigation

    The advantages of arbitration

    19 May 2021

    Proceedings do not always have to be in court. There are other ways to resolve legal disputes. An important and often also appealing alternative is arbitration. In particular if you are doing business internationally. What are the advantages of arbitration?

    read on
    • Works Council
    • Employment law and dismissal

    Works council

    4 May 2021

    Is there already a works council in your company? Are you a member of your company’s works council? What are the advantages of having a works council in your company? Jan Dop and Priscilla C.X. de Leede explain the role of the works council and give an overview of the works council’s most important rights.

    read on
    • Expats
    • Administrative law and the environment

    The Netherlands: Gateway to Europe

    3 May 2021

    The Netherlands likes to present itself as “the gateway to Europe.” And not without reason: excellent travel connections (Schiphol Amsterdam Airport and Rotterdam Seaport) and a highly educated population speaking several languages.

    read on
    • Corporate law

    Do you have to amend your articles of association due to the new Management and Supervision of Legal Entities Act?

    15 April 2021

    The Management and Supervision of Legal Entities Act will enter into force on 1 July 2021. How does this affect the articles of association of your foundation, association or cooperative association?

    read on