Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55Charities may be liable for accidents that happen to volunteers during their work. However, there are limits to this, as the Supreme Court ruled on 24 December 2021. What are these limits?

A beautifully lit Christmas tree in a village brings even more Christmas atmosphere to a dark winter. This was also the opinion of the village council of Hunsel in Limburg. It therefore decided to take on the responsibility of placing the tree itself when the municipality stopped this tradition in 2011. The village council entrusted the placing of the tree to the Speelruimte Foundation, that ran the local playground.
In 2013, things went completely wrong. The six-metre Christmas tree stood in a front garden and had yet to be cut down by the foundation’s volunteers. To prevent damage to house, fence and garden shed, a rope had to be attached to the tree. An aerial work platform had been brought along for this purpose, but it did not fit in the small garden. A ladder was still in the playground, over 600 metres away. Moreover, it had started to rain. Thus, an eager volunteer climbed the tree himself to attach the rope. However at 3.5 metres, he fell from the tree onto the garden shed and suffered paraplegia.
Is the volunteer entitled to damages? Or is he the victim of his own initiative?
According to the District Court, the volunteer had to pay for his damage. He therefore lodged an appeal. In the appeal, he held the Speelruimte Foundation liable as the commissioning party. According to the Court of Appeal, however, the foundation had not given any assignment to the volunteers. After all, the victim was free not to participate in the Christmas action. In addition, the volunteers had divided the tasks on their own initiative. And that own initiative was precisely what had led to the accident. Therefore, there was no question of invoking employer’s liability, whereby the employer is in principle liable for accidents at work.
Still, the foundation was liable. It knew that a six-metre Christmas tree had to be cut down. It is obvious that this can cause danger, especially, in a crowded, small garden. That the volunteers did not have the necessary qualifications for the job is also clear. Therefore, the foundation had a duty of care and it had not fulfilled this duty. The fact that the foundation itself also consisted of volunteers did not change this. It should have given directions, which it did not do. The correct materials were also missing: the aerial work platform did not fit in the garden and the ladder was still in the playground.
However, the volunteer was also to blame. He had climbed the tree on his own initiative, because he did not want to wait for the ladder to be fetched due to the rain. In the end, this led to the judgment that the Speelruimte Foundation was liable for 75% and the unfortunate volunteer for 25%.
The ruling of the Court of Appeal was confirmed in cassation by the Supreme Court. Unfortunately, without explanation. However, in his advice to the Supreme Court the Advocate-General did summarize in what situations the statutory regulation for employer’s liability applies to commissioning parties of volunteers:
All three of these conditions must be met. In addition, normal liability also applies when working with volunteers. But the threshold for this is higher than for employer’s liability.
Are you a director of an organisation with volunteers and is your organisation held liable? Or are you yourself held liable as a director and are looking for legal assistance? We have extensive experience in supporting charities and will be happy to assist you. Please contact:
The salary thresholds for highly skilled migrants and European Blue Card holders are adjusted annually. What will be the amounts for 2026? Also, stricter rules for the highly skilled migrant scheme are proposed. What might change?
When can directors be held personally liable? What can directors do to prevent being held personally liable?
On-call contracts offer many advantages for both employers and on-call employees. However, there are also a few rules that they need to take into account. What are they?
What shall we do with the drunken employee? Sack him? That isn’t always allowed. Alcohol abuse may be the result of an addiction and in that case the prohibition on termination during illness may apply. What do you have to take into account when dismissing an employee due to alcohol consumption?
24 November 2025 was Equal Pay Day in the Netherlands: the day of the year when men have earned on average as much as women in a whole year. How can the European Directive on wage transparency ensure that men and women are paid equally?
Managing a nonprofit organization requires not only idealism and dedication, but also a sensible approach to legal opportunities and risks. This ensures that the charity is future-proof. What are the important issues that need to be properly addressed?