Publication date: 26 November 2019
As of 1 January 2020, you must be able to prove that the employee has a contract for an indefinite period to qualify for lower unemployment insurance contribution. This contract must be in writing, provided with a date and signed by you and the employee. In addition, a fixed number of hours must also be agreed upon. If you cannot prove this, you have to pay an additional 5% of the wage sum as contribution.
It must become more attractive for employers to employ people on a permanent basis. That is the aim of the Labour Market in Balance Act. One of the instruments for this is a differentiation in the unemployment insurance contribution. For employees with a fixed-term contract or an on-call contract a 5% higher contribution must be paid than for employees with an indefinite contract. For 2020, the contributions are respectively 7.94% and 2.94% of the wage sum. The difference in contributions can amount to € 2861.60 per employee in the coming year.
In order to qualify for the lower contribution, you must be able to prove that the employee does have a permanent contract. There are three things you need to prove:
You can prove this if you have an indefinite contract in your records.
Many employees started out on a temporary contract which was then converted into a permanent employment contract. If the other terms and conditions of employment have not changed, many employers will not conclude a new employment contract in writing. In that case you will thus not have the required proof to qualify for the lower contribution. How do you solve this?
To prove that you have concluded a permanent contract, you do not need to draft and have signed a completely new work contract. You can use an addition to the existing temporary employment contract, an addendum. Here you can specify the date from which the employee is employed for an indefinite period.
The employee needs to sign the addendum. Normally this will not be a problem. In this case, you will probably not be able to invoke a unilateral amendment clause due to the obligation to sign.
Would you like to have checked whether your employment contracts are sufficient as proof for the lower unemployment insurance contribution? Or do you want us to draft an addendum? Or do you have any other questions about work contracts and dismissal of employees? Please contact our employment lawyers:
In the last issue of Stare Decisis, Priscilla de Leede of Russell Advocaten, Mary Edenfield of Mateer Harbert and Ed Belam of Marriott Harrison discuss the most important topics to include in your employment contracts regarding the termination of the contract. There are some important differences to take into account!read on
A sick employee may not be dismissed. However, an employee who knows of imminent dismissal, cannot avoid this by reporting sick. But when does the employee know that this is the case? This question was central to the court case concerning the dismissal of a CFO of Volksbank.read on
If your employee reports sick, this may raise many difficult questions. What are your reintegration obligations during the sick leave period? What are you allowed to record about your sick employee with regard to the privacy legislation? We answered these and other questions during a webinar. Watch the video!read on
Is there already a works council in your company? Are you a member of your company’s works council? What are the advantages of having a works council in your company? Jan Dop and Priscilla C.X. de Leede explain the role of the works council and give an overview of the works council’s most important rights.read on
Russell Advocaten has for the 17th consecutive year in a row been included in The Legal 500. We are pleased with the recognition for the quality of our legal services by experts and clients. Please read what they say about us:read on