Jan Dop

partner

Jan is a specialist in employment law and corporate law

jan.dop@russell.nl
+31 20 301 55 55

Transfer of undertaking: Prohibition to dismiss in view of transfer of undertaking

Publication date 26 May 2016

Planning on a merger, acquisition or division of (part of) a business in the Netherlands or any other EU country? Then be aware of the EU law that sets out the strong position of employees in case of a transfer of undertaking (Directive 2001/23/EC). Russell Advocaten will inform you of the EU law on transfer of undertaking and the consequences thereof by a series of newsletters. This time: Prohibition to dismiss in view of a transfer of undertaking.

herplaatsing-social-media.fb6b52

Dismissal in view of transfer of undertaking not allowed

Dismissing the employee(s) due to or in view of a transfer is prohibited. This applies to both the transferor and transferee of a business. If the employer acts in violation of this prohibition of termination, the employee may within 2 month request the court to quash the dismissal or to grant a compensation. However, dismissal is allowed in case the reason for dismissal does not have any connection with the transfer of undertaking, for instance, because of unsatisfactory performance of the employee or economical, technical or organizational reasons (referred to as “eto-reasons”).

Unwilling employee

In the event the employee unambiguously refuses to become employed by the transferee, the employee will not be transferred by law to the transferee and the employment contract with the transferor will terminate. If the reason for the refusal of the employee is due to a significant disadvantage he will suffer because of the transfer of undertaking (for instance, more time commuting) and this reason justifies termination of the employment contract, the termination will be at the expense of the employer and the latter will have to pay a transition compensation.

More information

Would you like to receive more information about the EU law on transfer of undertaking and the consequences thereof? Or do you have any other questions on employment law? Please contact us:

    We process the personal data above with your permission. You can withdraw your permission at any time. For more information please see our Privacy Statement.

    Related publications

    On-call employees

    On-call contracts offer many advantages for both employers and on-call employees. However, there are also a few rules that they need to take into account. What are they?

    Read more

    Legislative proposal for greater security for flex workers

    The government wants to improve the legal position of flex workers with a new law. What will it mean for employers and flex workers if the legislative proposal is adopted? What new rules will you need to take into account?

    Read more

    Bill introducing a legal presumption of an employment contract based on an hourly rate passed

    A new law stipulates that self-employed persons earning less than 38 euros per hour are, in principle, deemed to be employees. What does this mean for contractors and their clients? What exceptions might there be to this legal presumption based on an hourly rate?

    Read more

    Statutory minimum hourly wage

    The statutory minimum hourly wage changes every six months. What are the new amounts as of 1 July 2026?

    Read more

    Dismissal on the spot for a minor offence. Is that allowed?

    Can you dismiss your employee with immediate effect after a minor offence, such as the theft of a (very) low-value product? Yes, you can! However, a recently published decision shows it does not go without a risk!

    Read more

    Privacy of ill employees

    Employees have a right to privacy in their private lives. This also applies to sick employees. However, they must also comply with their reintegration obligations and provide accurate information about their illness. What options does the employer have to check whether they are actually doing this?

    Read more