Publication date: 2 January 2020
As of 1 January 2015, the legal position of flex workers has been strengthened.
Employees with fixed-term contracts will sooner be entitled to an employment contract for an indefinite period. The so-called chain rule (ketenregeling) will be tightened. In successive fixed-term employment contracts succeeding each other within a period of six months (currently: three) the fourth contract or a period of two years (currently: three) will constitute an employment contract for an indefinite period. As of 1 January 2020 the period is three years (instead of two).
Fixed-term employment contracts of six months or less may no longer include a trial period clause. In addition, in conformity with current case law, it will be included in the Dutch Civil Code that a trial period clause is null and void in the event of successive employment contracts. The only exception is a new employment contract that explicitly demands other skills or responsibilities. In that case a trial period clause will apply.
Fixed-term employment contracts may no longer include a non-competition clause. This is only permitted in exceptional cases. In such a case, the employer must motivate in detail in the non-competition clause itself what the considerable business interests are that require a non-competition clause.
Upon the expiry of a fixed-term employment contract lasting six months or longer, the employer must notify the employee at least one month before the employment contract expires about (1) whether or not the employment contract will be renewed and (2) the conditions under which the employment contract might be continued. If the employer fails to notify the employee entirely about whether or not the employment contract will be renewed, the employee will be entitled to a compensation of one month’s salary. In the event the employee will not be notified in a timely manner, the employer must pay a compensation pro rata.
As of 1 January 2015, the term of notification is effective for all existing and new fixed-term employment contracts of six months or longer.
The period in which the obligation to continue to pay salary may be excluded (for instance, in the event of illness or reduction of activities) will be limited. In contrast to the current situation, the obligation to continue to pay salary can in principle not be excluded by CAO for a period longer than the first six months of the employment contract. Only with respect to employment contracts through temporary employment agencies and to jobs, whose activities are by nature incidental and without a fixed scope, it will remain possible to exclude, by way of a CAO, the obligation to continue to pay salary. As regards the first six months of the employment contract, it will remain difficult to exclude the obligation to continue to pay salary from individual employment contracts. This possibility can be excluded on request to the Labour Foundation by the Minister of Social Affairs and Employment for certain industries, in the government programme it was agreed that such a request will be granted for zero-hours healthcare contracts.
The current possibility to exclude the obligation to continue to pay salary will remain effective for employment agreements entered into before 1 January 2015.
What must employers keep in mind regarding a work culture where everyone feels comfortable? What are the legal rights of pregnant employees and employees with children? Our lawyers Eileen Pluijm and Priscilla de Leede answer these questions in their article in Lady Justice, the magazine of the Women Lawyers Section of Primerus.read on
What rights does the works council have in relation to measures against the coronavirus within the company? And what role does the works council play with regard to the (im)possibility of mandatory vaccination against the coronavirus?read on
According to the Amsterdam District Court, Uber drivers are employees. Therefore, they are covered by the collective agreement of the taxi industry with all associated rights and obligations. How did the District Court reach this judgement? And what does it mean for other forms of platform work?read on
In this article, we will discuss several questions and challenges in the field of Dutch employment law, tenancy law and contract law during COVID-19.read on
Do the new rules of the Supreme Court for the assessment of employment contracts also have consequence for management agreements? Case law has not decided yet. This can be seen from the judgments of the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal and the District Court of Midden-Nederland about the management agreement of the CFO of Volksbank.read on
A sick employee may not be dismissed. However, an employee who knows of imminent dismissal, cannot avoid this by reporting sick. But when does the employee know that this is the case? This question was central to the court case concerning the dismissal of a CFO of Volksbank.read on
Employers can determine rules on clothing and appearance in company regulations. What do employers have to keep in mind when setting such rules?read on
In the last issue of Stare Decisis, Priscilla de Leede of Russell Advocaten, Mary Edenfield of Mateer Harbert and Ed Belam of Marriott Harrison discuss the most important topics to include in your employment contracts regarding the termination of the contract. There are some important differences to take into account!read on