Employers are no longer allowed to prohibit ancillary activities of employees without any reason. But what can you, as an employer, do to prevent your company or your employees from getting into trouble because they take on another job?
Currently, most ancillary activities clauses contain an absolute prohibition on ancillary activities. From 1 August 2022, a prohibition to perform ancillary activities will only be valid if it can be justified on the basis of objective grounds.
However, the legislator does not point out what an ‘objective ground’ is. The Working Conditions Directive does mention a few examples, such as:
There might also be objective grounds if the employee works more hours than permitted under the Working Hours Act. In order to assess whether there is an objective ground, the employer must assess it in terms of its effectiveness (suitability and appropriateness) and proportionality. The interests of the employee also have to be taken into account.
As of 1 August 2022, clauses will be immediately null and void if they prohibit ancillary activities or contain grounds which are not ‘objective’. As an employer, you can however repair this nullity by giving an objective ground when you want to prohibit ancillary activities.
It is advisable to include an amended ancillary activities clause in new employment contracts, which states that ancillary activities are only prohibited subject to objective grounds. We advise you not to include any concrete objective grounds in the clause; after all, you only have to give an objective ground when you actually invoke the clause. That way, you as an employer are not restricted to the grounds stated in the clause.
Do you have any questions about the new regulation of ancillary activities of employees? Do you want us to check your ancillary activities clauses? Or do you have any other employment law issues you would like to submit to a lawyer? Please contact us:
If a contract has ended, there may still be obligations you want your contract partner to fulfil, such as warranties or confidentiality. You can regulate this through survival clauses. What should you look out for when including such clauses?
A director under the articles of association is appointed by an appointment decision by an authorised body. What might be the consequences if this decision was not established in writing?
The franchise agreement and the distribution agreement are very similar, but there are also important differences. What are the consequences if you conclude a franchise agreement when it is actually a distribution agreement or vice versa? How can you avoid this misunderstanding?
With the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration again enforcing the Deregulation of Assessment of Employment Relationships Act (DBA Act), these questions have become even more important. In a recent ruling on Uber drivers, the Supreme Court provided additional guidance on how to determine whether someone is a self-employed person.
The government has outlined in a letter how it intends to translate the proposals from the Buma Committee’s advice into regulations. What does this mean in practice for private individuals who own art or other cultural goods? But first: what are the rules for exporting protected cultural goods at the moment?
The government has outlined in a letter how it intends to translate the proposals from the Buma Committee’s advice into regulations. What does this mean in practice for private owners of art or other cultural goods? Will this solve the problems of owners?
