Publication date: 22 November 2016
The Supreme Court of the Netherlands has recently ruled that secondment and payrolling are to be considered as temporary employment contracts. This means seconders and payroll employers are allowed to apply a more flexible dismissal regime to temporary employment contracts.
A temporary employment contract is an employment contract where the employee is made available by the employer, in the context of his business activities, to third parties to perform work under the latters’ supervision. It has been unclear for quite some time whether only contracts by “classic” temporary employment agencies were covered by this definition or whether employment contracts by more recent triangle relations, such as seconders and payroll employers could also be considered as temporary employment contracts.
The Dutch Supreme Court has recently determined that the work to be performed for a third party does not have to be temporary for the existence of a temporary employment contract. Pursuant to the Supreme Court, it is not required that the employer fulfils a so-called “allocation function”. For the existence of a temporary employment contract it is therefore not necessary that the employer deals with linking demand and supply of (temporary) work, as “classic” temporary employment agencies do. As a result, secondment and payrolling are also covered by the definition of temporary employment contracts.
As a consequence, seconders and payroll employers can make use of the more flexible dismissal regime that applies to temporary employment contracts, including:
That fact that secondment and payrolling can be considered as temporary employment contracts also means that they will be potentially covered by the (legally binding) ABU collective agreement and the mandatory StiPP pension scheme of the temporary employment industry.
Pursuant to the Supreme Court, it is up to the employer to impose limits to avoid potential negative implications in practice. However, the Supreme Court emphasizes that judges do have the right to suspend the more flexible dismissal scheme for seconders and payroll employers on the basis of reasonableness and fairness.
In short, it seems to have become more attractive to employers to make use of secondment and payrolling for their flexible staff. However, it is perfectly possible that this will be limited by the legislator in the future, or, in individual cases, by a court.
Would you like to get more information on the possibilities of secondment and payrolling? Or do you have any other questions about other forms of flexible employment relationships? Please contact Russell Advocaten:
A sick employee may not be dismissed. However, an employee who knows of imminent dismissal, cannot avoid this by reporting sick. But when does the employee know that this is the case? This question was central to the court case concerning the dismissal of a CFO of Volksbank.read on
If your employee reports sick, this may raise many difficult questions. What are your reintegration obligations during the sick leave period? What are you allowed to record about your sick employee with regard to the privacy legislation? We answered these and other questions during a webinar. Watch the video!read on
Is there already a works council in your company? Are you a member of your company’s works council? What are the advantages of having a works council in your company? Jan Dop and Priscilla C.X. de Leede explain the role of the works council and give an overview of the works council’s most important rights.read on
Russell Advocaten has for the 17th consecutive year in a row been included in The Legal 500. We are pleased with the recognition for the quality of our legal services by experts and clients. Please read what they say about us:read on