The Supreme Court of the Netherlands has recently ruled that secondment and payrolling are to be considered as temporary employment contracts. This means seconders and payroll employers are allowed to apply a more flexible dismissal regime to temporary employment contracts.
A temporary employment contract is an employment contract where the employee is made available by the employer, in the context of his business activities, to third parties to perform work under the latters’ supervision. It has been unclear for quite some time whether only contracts by “classic” temporary employment agencies were covered by this definition or whether employment contracts by more recent triangle relations, such as seconders and payroll employers could also be considered as temporary employment contracts.
The Dutch Supreme Court has recently determined that the work to be performed for a third party does not have to be temporary for the existence of a temporary employment contract. Pursuant to the Supreme Court, it is not required that the employer fulfils a so-called “allocation function”. For the existence of a temporary employment contract it is therefore not necessary that the employer deals with linking demand and supply of (temporary) work, as “classic” temporary employment agencies do. As a result, secondment and payrolling are also covered by the definition of temporary employment contracts.
As a consequence, seconders and payroll employers can make use of the more flexible dismissal regime that applies to temporary employment contracts, including:
That fact that secondment and payrolling can be considered as temporary employment contracts also means that they will be potentially covered by the (legally binding) ABU collective agreement and the mandatory StiPP pension scheme of the temporary employment industry.
Pursuant to the Supreme Court, it is up to the employer to impose limits to avoid potential negative implications in practice. However, the Supreme Court emphasizes that judges do have the right to suspend the more flexible dismissal scheme for seconders and payroll employers on the basis of reasonableness and fairness.
In short, it seems to have become more attractive to employers to make use of secondment and payrolling for their flexible staff. However, it is perfectly possible that this will be limited by the legislator in the future, or, in individual cases, by a court.
Would you like to get more information on the possibilities of secondment and payrolling? Or do you have any other questions about other forms of flexible employment relationships? Please contact Russell Advocaten:
Statutory directors enjoy less protection against dismissal, but there must still be reasonable grounds for the dismissal. Otherwise, the employer must pay fair compensation. This can be substantial, as a recent ruling has shown. Why was the employer required to pay this compensation?
The European AI Act requires employers to ensure that employees have sufficient knowledge of AI systems. This can be achieved through training, but also through an AI policy tailored to the company. What should you include in such a policy? What role does the works council play in the implementation of the AI policy?
Reinier W.L. Russell, LL.M. has published an article on The benefits of a works council for entrepreneurs in the “Off the record” section of Primerus Weekly on March 3, 2026. Below you will find the text of this article.
Employees who are underperforming may be dismissed. However, they must first be given the opportunity to improve their performance through a performance improvement plan (PIP). What requirements must such a plan meet?
The works council has the right of consent when establishing, amending or withdrawing a remuneration system. Is an amendment to a share scheme an amendment to the remuneration system?
The salary thresholds for highly skilled migrants and European Blue Card holders are adjusted annually. What will be the amounts for 2026? Also, stricter rules for the highly skilled migrant scheme are proposed. What might change?
