Are freelancers also protected by the ban on obstructions?

Publication date: 3 June 2020
Self-employed workers without personnel can sometimes invoke the ban on obstructions from the Placement of Personnel by Intermediaries Act (Waadi). In that case a non-competition clause or non-solicitation clause does not apply. This is the case, for instance, if the employer hires a former worker as a temporary employee.

detachering

Ban on obstructions

The Waadi includes the ban on obstructions. This ban means that an employee may not be hindered from entering into employment with the hirer after the secondment. Therefore, a non-competition or non-solicitation clause in the employment contract between the employee and lending company is not valid.

Applicable to self-employed workers without personnel?

In 2016, the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Appeal Court decided that the ban on obstructions shall not be applicable if the employee continues his activities with the former hirer as a freelancer. However, in a recent judgment, the Supreme Court pointed out that the ban on obstructions may still be applicable if the former employee starts working for the hirer on the basis of a contract of assignment.

This is because the ban on obstructions is based on the European Employment Agency Work Directive. According to the Supreme Court, the ban on obstructions therefore has to be interpreted in the same way as the Directive. The European Directive on Temporary Agency Work prohibits, in addition to obstructing the conclusion of an employment contract, “the establishment of an employment relationship” with the former hiring company.

An employment relationship exists if “for a certain period of time, a person performs services for and under the direction of another person, in return for which he receives remuneration.” This is a broader concept than an ‘employment contract’. According to the Supreme Court, the legal relationship between a freelancer and the company he was initially hired by can qualify as an employment relationship.

Practical consequences

Thus a self-employed worker can invoke the ban on obstructions if he works under the direction of the former hiring company. However, the existence of a relationship of authority is precisely what a self-employed worker and a client usually want to avoid as it is not in keeping with the independence of a freelancer and the context of the Assessment of Employment Relationships (Deregulation) Act (Wet DBA). A relationship of authority can in fact be an indication of paid employment, with all the fiscal consequences. So the question is whether self-employed workers without personnel still want to invoke the ban on obstructions.

More information

Would you like more information about the ban on obstructions or hiring and supplying employees? Please contact us:

    Share on social media

    • Employment law and dismissal

    Personnel: contractor or employee?

    9 November 2020

    What is the difference between a contract for services and an employment contract? Are you sure that a contractor does not qualify as an employee? And why is this difference of importance?

    read on
    • Employment law and dismissal

    Equality in the workplace: Taking care of female employees

    21 October 2021

    What must employers keep in mind regarding a work culture where everyone feels comfortable? What are the legal rights of pregnant employees and employees with children? Our lawyers Eileen Pluijm and Priscilla de Leede answer these questions in their article in Lady Justice, the magazine of the Women Lawyers Section of Primerus.

    read on
    • Works Council
    • Employment law and dismissal

    Works council: COVID-19 measures and mandatory vaccinations

    19 October 2021

    What rights does the works council have in relation to measures against the coronavirus within the company? And what role does the works council play with regard to the (im)possibility of mandatory vaccination against the coronavirus?

    read on
    • IT and ICT
    • Employment law and dismissal

    Uber drivers are employees, not self-employed workers

    14 September 2021

    According to the Amsterdam District Court, Uber drivers are employees. Therefore, they are covered by the collective agreement of the taxi industry with all associated rights and obligations. How did the District Court reach this judgement? And what does it mean for other forms of platform work?

    read on
    • Retail
    • Employment law and dismissal

    Questions and challenges during COVID-19: Dutch employment law, tenancy law and contract law

    13 September 2021

    In this article, we will discuss several questions and challenges in the field of Dutch employment law, tenancy law and contract law during COVID-19.

    read on
    • Corporate law

    Is a management agreement an employment contract or a contract for services?

    26 August 2021

    Do the new rules of the Supreme Court for the assessment of employment contracts also have consequence for management agreements? Case law has not decided yet. This can be seen from the judgments of the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal and the District Court of Midden-Nederland about the management agreement of the CFO of Volksbank.

    read on
    • Employment law and dismissal

    Dismissal of sick statutory director

    12 August 2021

    A sick employee may not be dismissed. However, an employee who knows of imminent dismissal, cannot avoid this by reporting sick. But when does the employee know that this is the case? This question was central to the court case concerning the dismissal of a CFO of Volksbank.

    read on
    • Employment law and dismissal

    Personnel: Rules on employee appearance in company regulations

    10 August 2021

    Employers can determine rules on clothing and appearance in company regulations. What do employers have to keep in mind when setting such rules?

    read on