Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55It seems a safe choice to distribute risk with group companies. Therefore, the disadvantages are likely to be overlooked. Through group companies you will not only limit liability but also claims to third parties. So what do you have to look out for?
Private limited companies (BVs) and Public limited companies (NVs) are well-suited to limit the risk of the entrepreneur. As the company bears its own rights and obligations, the management (and shareholders) are not directly liable for potential debts. Through group companies the risk can be limited even further. Several companies will be established, each performing its own activities. Often they are led by or “hooked to” a parent company. If, for instance, one company of the group will go bankrupt, the other companies of the group will not automatically go bankrupt either.
However, group companies do not only have advantages. For example, great care is required in group financing and issuing and revoking “403 statements”. It is often overlooked that there are also risks involved if group companies contract. The different companies often work in close cooperation, for instance when concluding contacts that are relevant for several companies of the group. Often, one company will be the contracting party and this company will, in principle, be the only one entitled to address the other party regarding its obligations under the contract.
In a recent case before the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal, within a group, company A had bought tubes that company B had used in housing construction. After company A had gone bankrupt, company B wanted to address the seller because the tubes were defective. Though the seller had sent the invoices to company B and the materials had been supplied there too, according to the Court of Appeal, company B had not been involved sufficiently close in the performance of the contract. Only company A had acted as a party to the contract and company B had no opportunity to recover the damage from the seller.
Conversely, confusion can arise when several companies of the group are involved in the formation of a contract. Who are the contracting parties? The Amsterdam District Court ruled that the companies involved have the responsibility to dispel the confusion of the other party as quickly as possible. If they don’t do so, all companies of the group may be considered as contracting parties and will therefore be obliged to fulfil the contract.
Would you like to get more information about the possibilities of spreading risk when contracting through group companies? Or do you have any other questions concerning contracts and liability, please contact us:
An earn-out in the event of a company takeover offers opportunities and risks. The former director and major shareholder remains involved in the company and part of the purchase price remains dependent on future performance. What aspects are important here?
Many companies do not have a works council, even though they should. When is it mandatory to establish one? What are the advantages of a works council? What are the consequences if your company does not have a works council?
In principle, a continuing performance agreement can always be terminated, even if no arrangements have been made in this regard. But you can’t just do it. What do you need to take into account when terminating the agreement? And what if you want to deviate from the arrangements made about terminating the agreement?
If a contract has ended, there may still be obligations you want your contract partner to fulfil, such as warranties or confidentiality. You can regulate this through survival clauses. What should you look out for when including such clauses?
A director under the articles of association is appointed by an appointment decision by an authorised body. What might be the consequences if this decision was not established in writing?
The franchise agreement and the distribution agreement are very similar, but there are also important differences. What are the consequences if you conclude a franchise agreement when it is actually a distribution agreement or vice versa? How can you avoid this misunderstanding?
