Publication date: 30 January 2015
A good reputation is precious, both in the corporate world and your private life. However, after a dispute a reputation can be damaged quickly by social media content and negative information on the Internet. So what can you do to present this?
It’s impossible to imagine life today without social media use. People use, for instance, Twitter and Facebook to share their joys and sorrows. Social media can also be used for business in many positive ways. On the other hand, social networking can also have a negative impact. Throwing dirt at someone can result in serious reputation damage, when, for instance, a customer makes negative comments about your products on Facebook. To prevent this, it’s prudent to include a social media clause in your contracts.
It is common to include a non-competition clause and/or a business relations clause, and/or a confidentiality clause in employment contracts and settlement agreements. The employee is not allowed to join competitors, to approach customers of his former employer, or to share confidential data after the termination of employment. However, comments and “friendships” on social media platforms are not covered by these clauses. Therefore, employers are well-advised to include a social media clause in contracts and agreements too, so that there won’t be questions about whether approaching customers or business relations through Twitter, Facebook, or LinkedIn is prohibited as well and to prevent that negative comments are being made.
In the event this has not been included in the employment contract yet, upon termination of employment, employers will have to include a clause in the settlement agreement stipulating that the employee is not allowed to make negative comments about his (former) employer on the Internet. That way, reputation damage can be prevented. Mandatory “unfriending” of business relations is another way to prevent this.
It’s advisable to include a social media clause when entering into a contract. This applies to all contracts that will be terminated sooner or later and where both parties will go in different directions. This could be, for instance, shareholders agreements, letters of intent, sales and purchase agreements (SPA), collaboration contracts (partnerships / joint ventures), lease contracts, and agency and distribution agreements.
More and more couples include a social media clause in their divorce agreement. The spouses agree not to publish negative comments about each other on social media and that posting of unwanted photos/videos and sending hate mail will not be permitted.
If one of the parties violates the social media clause, (s)he has to pay the agreed-upon fine until all negative information will be deleted from the Internet. If the fine is not paid, the party can be summoned to appear in court by the other party.
Make sure to include a social media clause in your agreements. In particular, termination agreements should include a social media clause. Include a penalty clause as well and take care that it’s robust and unambiguously phrased. Thus, you can prevent not only reputation damage but also disputes about whether or not comments on social media platforms will fall under the clause.
Would you like to know more about (termination) agreements or social media clauses? Or do you have any other questions about contracts or the use of social media? Please contact us:
What must employers keep in mind regarding a work culture where everyone feels comfortable? What are the legal rights of pregnant employees and employees with children? Our lawyers Eileen Pluijm and Priscilla de Leede answer these questions in their article in Lady Justice, the magazine of the Women Lawyers Section of Primerus.read on
What rights does the works council have in relation to measures against the coronavirus within the company? And what role does the works council play with regard to the (im)possibility of mandatory vaccination against the coronavirus?read on
According to the Amsterdam District Court, Uber drivers are employees. Therefore, they are covered by the collective agreement of the taxi industry with all associated rights and obligations. How did the District Court reach this judgement? And what does it mean for other forms of platform work?read on
In this article, we will discuss several questions and challenges in the field of Dutch employment law, tenancy law and contract law during COVID-19.read on
Do the new rules of the Supreme Court for the assessment of employment contracts also have consequence for management agreements? Case law has not decided yet. This can be seen from the judgments of the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal and the District Court of Midden-Nederland about the management agreement of the CFO of Volksbank.read on
A sick employee may not be dismissed. However, an employee who knows of imminent dismissal, cannot avoid this by reporting sick. But when does the employee know that this is the case? This question was central to the court case concerning the dismissal of a CFO of Volksbank.read on
Employers can determine rules on clothing and appearance in company regulations. What do employers have to keep in mind when setting such rules?read on
In the last issue of Stare Decisis, Priscilla de Leede of Russell Advocaten, Mary Edenfield of Mateer Harbert and Ed Belam of Marriott Harrison discuss the most important topics to include in your employment contracts regarding the termination of the contract. There are some important differences to take into account!read on