Jan Dop

partner

Jan is a specialist in employment law and corporate law

jan.dop@russell.nl
+31 20 301 55 55

Are freelancers also protected by the ban on obstructions?

Publication date 3 June 2020

Self-employed workers without personnel can sometimes invoke the ban on obstructions from the Placement of Personnel by Intermediaries Act (Waadi). In that case a non-competition clause or non-solicitation clause does not apply. This is the case, for instance, if the employer hires a former worker as a temporary employee.

detachering

Ban on obstructions

The Waadi includes the ban on obstructions. This ban means that an employee may not be hindered from entering into employment with the hirer after the secondment. Therefore, a non-competition or non-solicitation clause in the employment contract between the employee and lending company is not valid.

Applicable to self-employed workers without personnel?

In 2016, the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Appeal Court decided that the ban on obstructions shall not be applicable if the employee continues his activities with the former hirer as a freelancer. However, in a recent judgment, the Supreme Court pointed out that the ban on obstructions may still be applicable if the former employee starts working for the hirer on the basis of a contract of assignment.

This is because the ban on obstructions is based on the European Employment Agency Work Directive. According to the Supreme Court, the ban on obstructions therefore has to be interpreted in the same way as the Directive. The European Directive on Temporary Agency Work prohibits, in addition to obstructing the conclusion of an employment contract, “the establishment of an employment relationship” with the former hiring company.

An employment relationship exists if “for a certain period of time, a person performs services for and under the direction of another person, in return for which he receives remuneration.” This is a broader concept than an ‘employment contract’. According to the Supreme Court, the legal relationship between a freelancer and the company he was initially hired by can qualify as an employment relationship.

Practical consequences

Thus a self-employed worker can invoke the ban on obstructions if he works under the direction of the former hiring company. However, the existence of a relationship of authority is precisely what a self-employed worker and a client usually want to avoid as it is not in keeping with the independence of a freelancer and the context of the Assessment of Employment Relationships (Deregulation) Act (Wet DBA). A relationship of authority can in fact be an indication of paid employment, with all the fiscal consequences. So the question is whether self-employed workers without personnel still want to invoke the ban on obstructions.

More information

Would you like more information about the ban on obstructions or hiring and supplying employees? Please contact us:

    We process the personal data above with your permission. You can withdraw your permission at any time. For more information please see our Privacy Statement.

    Related publications

    Personnel: contractor or employee?

    What is the difference between a contract for services and an employment contract? Are you sure that a contractor does not qualify as an employee? And why is this difference of importance?

    Read more

    Prejudgment and executory attachment in the Netherlands: Powerful tools in debt recovery

    When a debtor refuses to pay despite reminders and demand letters, stronger measures will be necessary to secure a claim. One of the most effective instruments in Dutch debt recovery is attachment. How can a creditor secure such an attachment?

    Read more

    Wwft: issues with bank accounts for charities and associations

    Under the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Prevention) Act (Wwft), banks may be obliged to refuse a customer or terminate their relationship with them. This can also happen to charities. When is a bank permitted to terminate the relationship? And must a customer cooperate with a bank’s investigation?

    Read more

    Dismissal of a statutory director without just cause: employer ordered to pay EUR 222,000

    Statutory directors enjoy less protection against dismissal, but there must still be reasonable grounds for the dismissal. Otherwise, the employer must pay fair compensation. This can be substantial, as a recent ruling has shown. Why was the employer required to pay this compensation?

    Read more

    Debt recovery in the Netherlands: what to do when a customer does not pay?

    Most business relationships run smoothly. Goods are delivered, services are provided and invoices are paid on time. Occasionally, however, a customer or business partner fails to pay. What can a creditor do in that situation?

    Read more

    AI policy for employers

    The European AI Act requires employers to ensure that employees have sufficient knowledge of AI systems. This can be achieved through training, but also through an AI policy tailored to the company. What should you include in such a policy? What role does the works council play in the implementation of the AI policy?

    Read more