Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55Jesper specialises in corporate litigation and governance
jesper.nooij@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55When can directors be held personally liable? What can directors do to prevent being held personally liable?

Legal entities, such as BVs (private limited company), NVs (public limited company), associations or foundations, can only be represented by one or more natural persons, the directors or other authorized persons. These are often natural persons, but may also be legal entities.
Directors conclude contracts on behalf of the legal person. If the company fails to comply with agreements arising from the contracts or causes damage, the company can be addressed, not the directors. However, in certain cases directors can be held personally liable by third parties (externally) or by the company itself (internally). When will this happen?
When a director does not perform his tasks properly, the company can hold him liable for the damage it was caused. This is referred to as internal directors’ liability. Every director is obliged to perform his duties properly pursuant to Section 2:9 of the Dutch Civil Code. If a director or one of his fellow directors performs his duties improperly, he is liable to the legal entity for the full amount of the damage. However, there is a way out for the director: if he cannot be seriously blamed and he has not been negligent in taking measures to avert the consequences, he can be released from the obligation to pay compensation.
Directors can be held internally liable of the damage caused because the director:
Furthermore, in the event of bankruptcy, directors can be held liable for the shortfall in the estate if they have performed their duties improperly. However, this must have been a significant cause of the bankruptcy.
A recent ruling by the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal illustrates internal director liability. In this case, the directors were sued by the company for improper management because they had unlawfully withdrawn funds from the company. The court ruled that the directors had not performed their duties properly and that they could be seriously blamed for this. Therefore, the directors were held liable for the damage suffered by the company.
Another recent ruling by the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal shows that directors can be held personally liable by the receiver on behalf of the company in the event of bankruptcy. This case concerned a private limited company that went bankrupt with a shortfall in its estate. The court found that the directors had performed their duties improperly and that this was a major cause of the bankruptcy. The directors had frustrated negotiations to prevent the bankruptcy and had not recorded payments correctly. Because the directors were unable to provide convincing evidence of an alternative cause of bankruptcy, they were held personally liable for the shortfall in the estate.
In principle, internal directors’ liability is collective. Thus, all board members are liable. An individual board member can avoid liability in the following cases:
In the event of external directors’ liability, directors are held liable for damage caused to third parties, such as suppliers of the company, suffering from directors’ actions.
For instance, a director can be held liable by third parties when damage was caused because the director:
In addition, a director may be held personally liable if he commits an unlawful act against a third party. The decisive factor is whether he can be seriously blamed for this. This must involve conscious or foreseeable actions that harm third parties.
A director may also be liable if he gives a misleading representation of the financial situation of the company, for example through the annual accounts. In that case, third parties who suffer damage as a result can hold the directors personally liable.
In a case before the Amsterdam District Court, the director of two companies was successfully held personally liable by the landlord of his business premises. Among other things, the director had ensured that the landlord was unable to collect rent arrears. Not only had the director emptied his company’s bank account, but he had also transferred the company’s inventory to a third party without compensation. The value of this would have been sufficient to pay the rent.
The damage can only be recovered successfully from the director when a serious personal blame can be made towards him. Thus, a minor mistake does not lead to directors’ liability.
A directors’ liability insurance (D&O insurance) covers a significant part of the directors’ liability, namely what is caused by serious culpable conduct. However, damage caused intentionally is not covered by the insurance.
Our lawyers have been advising both, companies and directors on external and internal directors’ liability for many years. We assist them by organising workshops but also by holding liable directors, and representing directors that are held liable. Would you like to learn more about or make use of our legal assistance? Please contact:
On 16 December 2025, the House of Representatives of the Netherlands adopted the Digital General Meeting for Private Law Legal Entities Act. This Act makes it possible to hold general meetings entirely digitally. What does this mean for directors and shareholders of private limited companies, public limited companies and other legal entities?
The Transparency and Countering Undermining by Civil Society Organisations Act (Wtmo) imposes a number of new obligations on charities in the Netherlands. What are these? What measures should non-profit organisations take as a result?
Managing a nonprofit organization requires not only idealism and dedication, but also a sensible approach to legal opportunities and risks. This ensures that the charity is future-proof. What are the important issues that need to be properly addressed?
An earn-out in the event of a company takeover offers opportunities and risks. The former director and major shareholder remains involved in the company and part of the purchase price remains dependent on future performance. What aspects are important here?
Many companies do not have a works council, even though they should. When is it mandatory to establish one? What are the advantages of a works council? What are the consequences if your company does not have a works council?
If a contract has ended, there may still be obligations you want your contract partner to fulfil, such as warranties or confidentiality. You can regulate this through survival clauses. What should you look out for when including such clauses?