Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55When issuing instructions to the directors of a subsidiary, a holding company has to observe not just the interests of the group as a whole but also the interests of the subsidiary. Directors of the subsidiary have their own responsibilities and may reject instructions that might jeopardize their firm’s survival.
Each company has the statutory requirement to promote its own interests. Consequently, companies from the same group may have conflicting interests in certain situations. What does this mean for the permissibility of instructions issued by a parent company to a subsidiary? Can a parent company impose on a subsidiary to provide an intragroup guarantee?
The management of the parent company can influence the policy of a subsidiary by providing in its articles of association that the management of the subsidiary has to observe the instructions issued by the general meeting of shareholders. This will allow the parent company as sole shareholder to issue instructions. It can also suspend disobedient directors via the general meeting of shareholders and in that way influence the policy of the subsidiary.
The right to issue instructions is not unlimited however. The general meeting of shareholders may not exceed the limits of its tasks and authorities, since it would otherwise take the place of the director. Besides it could result in personal liability of the shareholder. In short: the management of the company remains the domain of the management.
The content of the instructions is also restricted. For instance, it is not acceptable that the survival of the subsidiary will be seriously jeopardized as this would be opposed to the interests of the company. An example of this are instructions regarding financially irresponsible dividend payments.
The directors of the subsidiary have their own responsibility for observing instructions. They don’t have to blindly follow them but have to keep in mind the interest of both the company and the group as a whole.
The main interest of a company is to maintain the company’s well-being. Directors have the task to protect and promote the success of the company. If they don’t do so, they perform their duties improperly. This could concern, for instance, actions that can be predicted to jeopardise the company’s future, such as instructions for dividend payments whereas the financial situation of the company does not allow for this. In that case, the directors will be personally liable for the damage sustained by the company or third parties.
However, in group-relationships there is also another interest involved: the interest of the group as a whole. Directors of subsidiaries must be guided by the group interest but must not waste the interests of their “own” company.
These interests will often coincide, but the directors always have to evaluate the interests properly.
Instructing a subsidiary to provide an intragroup guarantee is permissible if it doesn’t jeopardise the survival of the subsidiary.
In practice, it will not occur easily. Usually, a subsidiary will benefit from observing the respective instructions
In an intragroup guarantee other companies have to provide a guarantee for the subsidiary too. Because of this, all group companies will benefit from a bigger credit margin and risk spreading. Thus, it will be helpful to the interests of the group and the interests of the company. And therefore, such instructions are permissible and the subsidiary will, in principle, have to observe them.
Would you like to lay down the right to issue instructions in the articles of association? Would you like to learn when to reject instructions? Or would you like to learn more about your tasks, authorities and liability as a director? Please contact us at:
Large Dutch companies are required by law to have a supervisory board. Do supervisory directors have fewer powers when it comes to a subsidiary of an international group? How independent do they have to be?
Under the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Prevention) Act (Wwft), banks may be obliged to refuse a customer or terminate their relationship with them. This can also happen to charities. When is a bank permitted to terminate the relationship? And must a customer cooperate with a bank’s investigation?
The Transparency and Countering Undermining by Civil Society Organisations Act (Wtmo) imposed a number of new obligations on charities in the Netherlands. However, the Act has been rejected by the Dutch Senate on 24 March 2026 and will not enter into force.
Statutory directors enjoy less protection against dismissal, but there must still be reasonable grounds for the dismissal. Otherwise, the employer must pay fair compensation. This can be substantial, as a recent ruling has shown. Why was the employer required to pay this compensation?
Reinier W.L. Russell, LL.M. has published an article on The benefits of a works council for entrepreneurs in the “Off the record” section of Primerus Weekly on March 3, 2026. Below you will find the text of this article.
On 16 December 2025, the House of Representatives of the Netherlands adopted the Digital General Meeting for Private Law Legal Entities Act. This Act makes it possible to hold general meetings entirely digitally. What does this mean for directors and shareholders of private limited companies, public limited companies and other legal entities?
