Publication date: 30 January 2018
A non-compete clause and a non-solicitation clause may not be included in temporary employment contracts. An exception applies in case of substantial business interests. These interests then have to be included in the respective clause.
A non-compete clause prohibits employees for a certain period beyond the term of their employment contract from being directly or indirectly active or involved in a business performing similar activities. A non-solicitation clause is an agreement between employer and employee that prohibits the employee from being active for or having contact with clients and business associates of the employer beyond the term of the employment contract.
Starting point is that a non-compete and non-solicitation clause are not valid in temporary contracts. The reason for this is that it would doubly disadvantage the employee: such a provision obstructs the transition to another job while it is clear from the beginning of the contract that it is just a temporary one. A provision is valid only if it contains the substantial business interests which require such a provision. If the employer has provided reasons but they fail to convince the court, the provision can be declared void retrospectively.
A recent case dealt with two employees of a company that invested in land for third parties. One of the employees had a fixed contract and the other one a temporary contract. Both had terminated their employment contract to jointly start a competing company. Next, they were held to the non-compete and non-solicitation clause. Is that allowed in case of the employee with a temporary contract, too?
The non-compete clause contains that the employee will gain complete insight in the operating method the employer’s market position is based upon, the location where the employer performs activities, and that he will be informed of the employer’s financial position so that a provision is required to protect the employer’s market position. The requirement of a non-solicitation clause is motivated by indicating that the company depends entirely on retaining its clients and business associates. The employees have so much contact with the employer’s clients that the employer has an interest in prohibiting the contact beyond the term of the contract.
Is this sufficient to maintain both provisions? The court decided positively in this question and considered both the non-compete and non-solicitation clause to be valid by taking into consideration that:
Therefore, also the employee with a temporary contract is prohibited from exploiting the competing business, as long as the clauses are effective.
A non-compete clause and a non-solicitation clause may be included in a temporary contract. However, formulating these clauses requires customization, because they have to provide sound reasons. Would you like a non-compete and/or non-solicitation clause drawn up? Or would you like to have existing agreements assessed? We will gladly check to what extent your employment contracts fulfil the statutory requirements. Please contact us:
Employers often wish to make a non-competition and / or non-solicitation clause applicable on their employees. The law requires such a clause to be agreed upon “in writing”. What does this mean exactly?read on
What may or may not be included in an employment contract, what do the various provisions mean and what do you have to bear in mind?read on
What must employers keep in mind regarding a work culture where everyone feels comfortable? What are the legal rights of pregnant employees and employees with children? Our lawyers Eileen Pluijm and Priscilla de Leede answer these questions in their article in Lady Justice, the magazine of the Women Lawyers Section of Primerus.read on
What rights does the works council have in relation to measures against the coronavirus within the company? And what role does the works council play with regard to the (im)possibility of mandatory vaccination against the coronavirus?read on
According to the Amsterdam District Court, Uber drivers are employees. Therefore, they are covered by the collective agreement of the taxi industry with all associated rights and obligations. How did the District Court reach this judgement? And what does it mean for other forms of platform work?read on
In this article, we will discuss several questions and challenges in the field of Dutch employment law, tenancy law and contract law during COVID-19.read on
Do the new rules of the Supreme Court for the assessment of employment contracts also have consequence for management agreements? Case law has not decided yet. This can be seen from the judgments of the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal and the District Court of Midden-Nederland about the management agreement of the CFO of Volksbank.read on
A sick employee may not be dismissed. However, an employee who knows of imminent dismissal, cannot avoid this by reporting sick. But when does the employee know that this is the case? This question was central to the court case concerning the dismissal of a CFO of Volksbank.read on