Reinier Russell

managing partner

Reinier advises national and international companies

reinier.russell@russell.nl
+31 20 301 55 55

Leasing/letting: Do bank guarantees still provide a guarantee for the lessor?

Publication date 25 april 2017

Banks can no longer recover the amount they guarantee via a bank guarantee from the estate in the event the lessor goes bankrupt. What are the consequences for lessors and lessees?

huur-en-verhuur - social media

The bank guarantee as a form of security

In lease agreements, the lessee usually provides a security for fulfilling his obligations against the lessor. In commercial leases, bank guarantees are commonly used. A bank guarantee is an agreement between the bank and the lessor. The lessee does not pay? In this event the bank will pay the lessor’s claim. The bank providing the bank guarantee requests a counter-guarantee from the lessee which requires the lessee to repay the amount the bank has paid arising from the bank guarantee.

The lessee is bankrupt – how about the bank guarantee?

If a lessee goes bankrupt, the lease becomes an estate debt that will be paid with priority. However, the trustee in bankruptcy and the lessor are entitled to terminate the lease in the interim. In this case, the lessor is often left with damage resulting from vacancy, which the lessee will have to compensate according to the lease agreement. For this, the lessor can use the bank guarantee. As a result of the developments in case law, lessors will derive no longer much security from the bank guarantee after a bankruptcy of the lessee.

In 2013, the Supreme Court decided that the estate may not be harmed by executing a bank guarantee, for instance by a claim on the counter-guarantee. Afterwards, banks modified the content of the bank guarantee in such a way that they do not have to pay the bank guarantee in case they cannot claim the amount under the counter-guarantee.

If the trustee in bankruptcy did not defend himself against the bank’s claim on the counter-guarantee, the trustee in bankruptcy was able to reclaim the amount paid by the bank and collected from the estate of the lessor. This path has now also been blocked by the Supreme Court. The trustee in bankruptcy will have to recover his claim from the bank. As a result the banks – as they do no longer have the opportunity to recover the counter-guarantee from the estate – will once more adjust the existing bank guarantees.

When the bank guarantee depends on obtaining the counter-guarantee, the lessor will have to “simply” submit a claim for the damage as a result of vacancy to the trustee in bankruptcy. The question is whether this damage will ever be (fully) compensated. In contrast to the lease, this claim will not be paid with priority.

And what now?

The wording of the bank guarantee is another issue to be discussed between lessee and lessor. Lessors will not want the bank guarantee to be dependent on the counter-guarantee of the (estate of the) lessee, whereas banks and lessees do not want to be left with damage or liability after the bankruptcy of the lessee.

A guarantee deposit paid to the lessor will provide the most security for the lessor. However, the question is whether the lessee is willing to make such a payment as he will lose he deposit in the event the lessor goes bankrupt.

More information

Would you like to learn more about bank guarantees or other forms of securities, for instance, about the amount of the guarantee deposit and its repayment? Or do you have any other questions about lease agreements? Please contact us:

    We process the personal data above with your permission. You can withdraw your permission at any time. For more information please see our Privacy Statement.

    Related publications

    Drugs and alcohol at work: 4 recent rulings

    Employees who consume alcohol and drugs during work or who want to work under the influence remain a problem for employers. What measures can you take against this? Are you allowed to test an employee if you suspect they are under the influence?

    Read more

    Earn-out in the event of a takeover: the position of the former director and major shareholder

    An earn-out in the event of a company takeover offers opportunities and risks. The former director and major shareholder remains involved in the company and part of the purchase price remains dependent on future performance. What aspects are important here?

    Read more

    Lease of business premises: adjusting the rent

    What should you bear in mind if you want to change the rent for your business premises? When are you allowed to adjust the price yourself? And in which cases do you have to go to court?

    Read more

    How do you terminate a continuing performance agreement?

    In principle, a continuing performance agreement can always be terminated, even if no arrangements have been made in this regard. But you can’t just do it. What do you need to take into account when terminating the agreement? And what if you want to deviate from the arrangements made about terminating the agreement?

    Read more

    28 June 2025 European Accessibility Act: digital products and services must be accessible to all

    On 28 June 2025, the European Accessibility Act will come into force. From that data, digital products and services must also be accessible to people with disabilities. Which companies, products and services does the Act apply to? What disabilities should you take into account? What are the consequences of not complying with the Act?

    Read more

    Contract termination: survival clauses

    If a contract has ended, there may still be obligations you want your contract partner to fulfil, such as warranties or confidentiality. You can regulate this through survival clauses. What should you look out for when including such clauses?

    Read more