Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55The WHOA makes it easier for a company facing bankruptcy to avoid bankruptcy. This can be done through a binding agreement with all creditors, even if they do not all agree to the arrangement. What rights do creditors have in WHOA proceedings?
The Act on homologation of private restructuring arrangements (Wet homologatie onderhands akkoord; WHOA) makes it easier for companies to restructure if they face bankruptcy.
The purpose of the WHOA is to restore the assets of viable companies in dire straits and avoid bankruptcy. It is about the continuity of a company and preserving its value. A company can offer its creditors and shareholders – or part of them – an arrangement under the WHOA that provides for a change in their rights. In practice, this will usually mean that the company will still only pay part of its debts.
Once homologated by the court, the arrangement is binding on all creditors and/or shareholders whose rights are modified under the arrangement. If certain conditions are met, the arrangement can be imposed on creditors who have not consented. Hence the term ‘forced arrangement’.
A WHOA process has seven steps, these will be briefly explained in the following.
To start proceedings, the distressed company can file a start-up statement with the court. This statement gives access to provisions that can help the company reach an agreement, such as a cooling-off period. However, this statement is not mandatory. The court can also be involved later in the process.
This step involves identifying the company’s financial position. The company can then consult with its shareholders and creditors and investigate whether an arrangement is feasible.
After consultation, a draft arrangement should be drawn up. It will set out the arrangements made with the shareholders and creditors of the company. In addition, the creditors and shareholders are divided into classes of similar creditors. The company is not obliged to offer an arrangement to all its creditors; it is possible to include just some of them. The draft arrangement must be provided to creditors and shareholders at least 8 days before the vote.
Creditors and shareholders vote by class. This can be either an electronic or written meeting/vote. A class is deemed to vote in favour if at least the representatives of 2/3rds of the total amount of claims in that class vote in favour.
If at least one class votes in favour, homologation of the arrangement by the court is possible. The court then determines the date on which the homologation petition will be heard. Creditors and shareholders must be notified in writing by the company.
Creditors can file objections until the day of the hearing. The court hears the objections and decides whether homologation can be granted.
If the court homologates the arrangement, it must be implemented by the creditors.
In the WHOA process, the distressed company has a lot of freedom. It chooses which debtors to include in the process and can organise the voting procedure itself. The homologated arrangement can in principle not be appealed, thus avoiding lengthy legal proceedings and allowing the company to complete the process efficiently and quickly. The court has only a limited role in the WHOA process.
An agreement is only eligible for homologation by the court if the requirements are met. One of the conditions is that the creditors and/or shareholders have been given the opportunity to express their opinion on the arrangement by vote. In addition, a forced arrangement will only be pronounced if it is justified in the circumstances.
This is why a number of grounds for rejection apply that can only be invoked by the creditors who voted against the arrangement. The grounds for rejection ensure that the arrangement is reasonable. For example, the court can reject the request if it appears that the applicant creditor is worse off under the arrangement than if the estate were liquidated in bankruptcy. In addition, SMEs should receive at least 20% of their claims.
Are you as a creditor involved in a WHOA process or at risk getting involved in one? Your invoices have not been paid? Please contact one of our lawyers:
On 16 December 2025, the House of Representatives of the Netherlands adopted the Digital General Meeting for Private Law Legal Entities Act. This Act makes it possible to hold general meetings entirely digitally. What does this mean for directors and shareholders of private limited companies, public limited companies and other legal entities?
As of 1 January 2026, the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Prevention) Act (Wwft) will change. Cash payments of EUR 3,000 or more will then be prohibited. What does this mean for the retail sector and the art trade?
When can directors be held personally liable? What can directors do to prevent being held personally liable?
The Transparency and Countering Undermining by Civil Society Organisations Act (Wtmo) imposes a number of new obligations on charities in the Netherlands. What are these? What measures should non-profit organisations take as a result?
A franchise agreement is often linked to an agreement for the lease of business premises. What happens if the franchisor and franchisee have a conflict? Does the lease agreement remain in force if there are problems with the franchise?
Managing a nonprofit organization requires not only idealism and dedication, but also a sensible approach to legal opportunities and risks. This ensures that the charity is future-proof. What are the important issues that need to be properly addressed?
