Reinier Russell

managing partner

Reinier advises national and international companies

reinier.russell@russell.nl
+31 20 301 55 55

Ícaro Santos

Ícaro specialises in corporate litigation.

+31 20 301 55 55

Earn-out in the event of a takeover: the position of the former director and major shareholder

Publication date 7 oktober 2025

An earn-out in the event of a company takeover offers opportunities and risks. The former director and major shareholder remains involved in the company and part of the purchase price remains dependent on future performance. What aspects are important here?

earn-out

When acquiring a company, it may be wise for the former director and major shareholder (DMS) to remain as a director after the purchase. First of all, the former DMS remaining is important for the continuity of the company. After all, they know the company like no other. Retaining the DMS’s knowledge of customers, suppliers, and internal processes can be crucial for successful continuation. This is valuable for the buyer because it increases the company’s chances of growth. In practice, the remaining in office of the former director is often linked to an earn-out.

What is an earn-out?

An earn-out is an agreement whereby part of the purchase price in a takeover is made dependent on the (future) performance of the company. The unpaid portion is only paid once the company achieves the expected results. It is important that concrete agreements are made about the objectives. Commonly used parameters are turnover, EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), or customer retention. The earn-out period, during which these targets must be achieved, usually lasts one to several years, depending on the agreements.

Advantages of an earn-out

Advantages for the buyer

  • Risk management: The buyer pays part of the purchase price only if the company has achieved the set performance targets. This limits the risk of the buyer paying too much for a company that does not meet expectations.
  • Flexibility in financing: With an earn-out, part of the purchase price is deferred. The buyer then needs less available capital and therefore has to finance less to complete the purchase.
  • Expertise of the seller: An earn-out incentivizes the seller to commit to achieving the agreed business objectives, as part of the purchase price depends on their performance.

Advantages for the seller

  • A higher sale price is possible: One of the most important advantages of the earn-out for the seller is the possibility of receiving a higher sale price when selling the company. Because part of the purchase price depends on the performance of the company, the seller can benefit from growth in profits during the earn-out period.
  • Flexibility in negotiations: If the buyer and seller disagree on the value of the company, the seller can use the earn-out to still receive a guaranteed amount for the sale without the negotiations breaking down. If the company performs well during the earn-out, the seller can still receive the asking price.
  • Involvement in the company: An earn-out gives the seller the opportunity to continue to play an active role in the company. This allows the seller to influence the strategic direction of the company.

Some points to consider

Conflicting interests in the earn-out

Accepting the earn-out implies that the former director and major shareholder (who is now a director) has confidence that the agreed targets are achievable. The pitfall, however, is that this person has a dual role: on the one hand, as a director who must serve the interests of the company, and on the other hand, as the seller who has a financial interest in achieving the earn-out targets.

Disagreement about targets

Another sticking point arises when there is disagreement about the earn-out targets. If these targets are not measurable and specifically laid down in the agreement, disputes may arise about whether the targets have been achieved. It is important to make specific agreements about, among other things, the targets set, the duration of the earn-out period, the method of monitoring, and the method of dispute resolution.

Disagreements about tasks

Another stumbling block in an earn-out can be that the buyer and seller may disagree about how the company should be managed. The seller will mainly focus on achieving the earn-out targets quickly, while the buyer may have a long-term vision. Clear agreements about tasks and responsibilities are therefore crucial.

Corporate and contracts lawyer

Would you like to know how to record agreements about an earn-out in such a way that the risks are limited? Please contact us. We are happy to think along with you and help you avoid risks.

    We process the personal data above with your permission. You can withdraw your permission at any time. For more information please see our Privacy Statement.

    Related publications

    3 reasons to establish a works council

    Many companies do not have a works council, even though they should. When is it mandatory to establish one? What are the advantages of a works council? What are the consequences if your company does not have a works council?

    Read more

    How do you terminate a continuing performance agreement?

    In principle, a continuing performance agreement can always be terminated, even if no arrangements have been made in this regard. But you can’t just do it. What do you need to take into account when terminating the agreement? And what if you want to deviate from the arrangements made about terminating the agreement?

    Read more

    Contract termination: survival clauses

    If a contract has ended, there may still be obligations you want your contract partner to fulfil, such as warranties or confidentiality. You can regulate this through survival clauses. What should you look out for when including such clauses?

    Read more

    Is an appointment decision required to be a statutory director?

    A director under the articles of association is appointed by an appointment decision by an authorised body. What might be the consequences if this decision was not established in writing?

    Read more

    Differences between franchise and distribution agreements

    The franchise agreement and the distribution agreement are very similar, but there are also important differences. What are the consequences if you conclude a franchise agreement when it is actually a distribution agreement or vice versa? How can you avoid this misunderstanding?

    Read more

    MSLEA: make sure your association and foundation’s articles of association are in order before 1 July 2026

    On 1 July 2026, part of the transitional law of the Management and Supervision of Legal Entities Act (MSLEA) will expire. This mainly affects the voting rights of directors or supervisory directors of associations and foundations. When do you need to amend your articles of association?

    Read more