Reinier Russell

managing partner

Reinier advises national and international companies

reinier.russell@russell.nl
+31 20 301 55 55

How can a director and major shareholder limit liability?

Publication date 17 October 2019

The DMS may be liable as a director and as a shareholder. This will be the case in the event of bankruptcy of the company as a result of mismanagement and in the event of a conflict of interest. The DMS can limit liability by means of good governance, directors’ liability insurance and discharge from internal liability.

aandeel-aan-toonder-weblijst

As a director, the director and major shareholder (DMS) may, in certain circumstances, be personally liable for the company’s debts. For example, the DMS may be held liable by third parties if he takes too much capital out of the company, so that creditors cannot be paid anymore. The DMS can also be held liable in the event of mismanagement or in the event of a conflict of interest.

Director and major shareholder

The DMS usually has at least two-thirds of equity interest and sufficient voting rights for (almost) full control of the company. He is also the director of the company. This special role may lead to the DMS being more likely to be held liable by creditors. An external financier, for example, could also want the DMS to provide a personal guarantee for the repayment of a loan.

When is the DMS liable?

The basic principle is that directors are not liable for debts of the company. This also applies to the DMS. However, in certain cases, directors can be held personally liable by third parties (externally), or by the company itself (internally), or, in the event of bankruptcy, by the trustee in bankruptcy (internally).

Mismanagement

Mismanagement occurs when a director puts at risk the continued existence of the company. The damage can only be successfully recovered from the director if a serious personal reproach can be made against him. Examples of mismanagement are:

  • Neglected accounting
  • Entering into commitments that jeopardise the company’s existence
  • Failure to draw up the annual accounts or to do so too late

Conflict of interest

As a director and shareholder, a DMS wears two hats. As a director, the DMS must focus on the interest of the company. As a shareholder, however, he will also want to receive returns and income from the company. If he pays too much salary or dividend to himself, or borrows money from the company via the current account, he can jeopardise the company’s existence or put creditors at a disadvantage. In this case, there may be personal liability of the DMS.

How can the DMS limit liability?

As a DMS, it is not possible to exclude liability for debts of the company altogether. However, it is possible to significantly limit liability. This can be done by:

  • Carrying out tasks properly, as a good manager
  • Taking out directors’ liability insurance
  • Receiving discharge of liability
  • Obtaining sufficient expert advice and assistance from, for example, a lawyer or an accountant

Directors’ liability insurance

Serious imputable acts can be covered by a directors’ liability insurance (D&O insurance). Damage caused intentionally is not covered.

lawyer for directors and major shareholders' liability

Discharge from liability

If the shareholders discharge a director from liability, the company and the trustee in bankruptcy can no longer invoke the internal liability of that director. The special feature of the DMS is that he can discharge himself, since the DMS is a director and a major shareholder. Here the risk is that discharge from liability is not formally granted, or that the purpose for which discharge is granted is not laid down. If this is not laid down, it is unclear for what purpose the discharge was granted and the directors’ liability will continue to exist.

Discharge from liability if all shareholders are directors

The following exception to the main rule, that discharge must be explicitly granted by means of a discharging decision, applies. If all shareholders are also directors, the signing of the annual accounts by all directors will be deemed to constitute adoption of the annual accounts. This will automatically result in the directors’ discharge from liability. However, this is subject to the condition that in case there are any other persons entitled to attend the meeting, they have been given the opportunity to take note of the annual accounts and have agreed to this way of adoption. This exception applies to many directors and major shareholders.

More information

Would you like to know more about the liability of the director and major shareholder? Would you like to get advice on limiting your personal liability? Please contact us:

    We process the personal data above with your permission. You can withdraw your permission at any time. For more information please see our Privacy Statement.

    Related publications

    Protection of the rights of the minority shareholder

    The majority shareholder and the board turn the company into an empty shell. How can you as a minority shareholder defend yourself against decisions that are detrimental to you?

    Read more

    Good governance: Make sure agreements with the sole shareholder are laid down in writing!

    Oral agreements with the sole shareholder of a company can easily be annulled. For instance, already provided management reimbursement can be reclaimed. How can you prevent this from happening?

    Read more

    2020: Mandatory registration in UBO register

    As of 27 September 2020, each newly established or already existing company in the Netherlands must register its UBOs in the UBO register at the Chamber of Commerce. How does that work? And how is the privacy of UBOs ensured?

    Read more

    Contract termination: survival clauses

    If a contract has ended, there may still be obligations you want your contract partner to fulfil, such as warranties or confidentiality. You can regulate this through survival clauses. What should you look out for when including such clauses?

    Read more

    Is an appointment decision required to be a statutory director?

    A director under the articles of association is appointed by an appointment decision by an authorised body. What might be the consequences if this decision was not established in writing?

    Read more

    Differences between franchise and distribution agreements

    The franchise agreement and the distribution agreement are very similar, but there are also important differences. What are the consequences if you conclude a franchise agreement when it is actually a distribution agreement or vice versa? How can you avoid this misunderstanding?

    Read more