Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55As directors, you are well advised to conduct investigations regarding the target company before, for instance, a share transaction or a takeover. Though it may not always be required to conduct proper due diligence investigations to account for a transaction, there will be less risk to be liable for mismanagement. When conducting due diligence investigations, make sure to go through important contracts and investigate the financial state of the company, the reliability of the administration, and the internal information provision in the financial field of the target company.

Before the takeover of a company the board of the buyer usually commissions due diligence investigations (also known as audits) of the company they intend to take over. Is the board required to do so or not? And in the event of investigations – how do they have to be conducted?
It is up to the management of the buyer to opt for due diligence investigations and to ensure proper investigations. By this, risks can be assessed that may lead to a reduction of the sales price or the inclusion of warranties in the sales contract. To take a responsible takeover decision it is important to be up to date regarding the risks of the target company and the transaction.
Apart from due diligence investigations, there is of course another way to identify the risks. However, directors will then be on a slippery slope. Opting for not conducting due diligence investigations may result in personal liability. However, this is not always the case.
The Enterprise Chamber has listed a number of conditions that together could lead to the result the option not to conduct due diligence investigations does not result in liability:
Actually, this implies that the management does not have to conduct due diligence investigations if it already has all information such investigations might disclose. Without this kind of information not performing due diligence investigations might result in liability of the board.
Directors’ liability may also arise if due diligence investigations were performed improperly. Which standards does the board have to take into consideration?
The Enterprise Chamber has indicated that due diligence investigations have to cover the financial condition, the reliability of the administration, and the internal provision of information in the financial field of the company to be taken over.
The following conditions may lead to the conclusion that due diligence investigations were conducted improperly:
As board, you are well advised to conduct investigations regarding the target company before, for instance, a share transaction or any other form of takeover. Though it may not always be required to conduct proper due diligence investigations to justify a transaction, the possibility to be held liable will be significantly lower.
When conducting due diligence investigations, make sure to check not only the current state of the company’s affairs, but also the obligations you will take over in the future. Go through important contracts and investigate the financial state of the company, the reliability of the administration, and the internal information provision in the financial field.
Would you like to learn more about due diligence investigations? Or would you like to commission due diligence investigations? Please contact Russell Advocaten:
Before the acquisition of a company, the buyer often conducts due diligence. Based on these investigations, the buyer will usually request the seller to include warranties and indemnities in the acquisition agreement. What are warranties and indemnities? And what happens if any of these is breached?
For the interpretation of articles of association the court uses other rules than for shareholders’ agreements. What are these rules? What consequences does this difference have for what you have to include in the articles of association and the shareholders’ agreement?
In the event of a conflict, shareholders may demand that a co-shareholder be compulsorily required to transfer his shares, also referred to as a buy-out. When is this allowed and how should it be arranged?
On 16 December 2025, the House of Representatives of the Netherlands adopted the Digital General Meeting for Private Law Legal Entities Act. This Act makes it possible to hold general meetings entirely digitally. What does this mean for directors and shareholders of private limited companies, public limited companies and other legal entities?
When can directors be held personally liable? What can directors do to prevent being held personally liable?
The Transparency and Countering Undermining by Civil Society Organisations Act (Wtmo) imposes a number of new obligations on charities in the Netherlands. What are these? What measures should non-profit organisations take as a result?