Reinier Russell

managing partner

Reinier advises national and international companies

reinier.russell@russell.nl
+31 20 301 55 55

Termination of a continuing performance agreement

Publication date 28 maart 2019

In principle, it is possible to terminate continuing performance agreements, even if the parties have made no arrangements to that end and the law does not provide for a termination arrangement. Sometimes the circumstances do require that there must also be substantial grounds for giving notice, possibly in combination with a notice period and the payment of financial compensation.

arbeidsovk - social media

Continuing performance agreements are characterized by having effect for a longer period of time. A continuing performance agreement does not require a one-off performance, but rather successive or continuous performance. In most continuing performance agreements parties have provided for a termination arrangement. If the parties have not agreed on a termination arrangement, a statutory arrangement may apply, as applies to rental or agency agreements. In addition, continuing performance agreements can be concluded for a fixed period. In principle, these agreements end on the agreed date. But what if the agreement does not include a termination regulation and there cannot be fallen back on statutory arrangements either?

Whether a continuing performance agreement without termination arrangement can be terminated depends on whether termination is reasonable in the given situation. Various factors play a role in this.

Termination without termination arrangement

In the majority of cases where both the law and the agreement do not provide for a termination arrangement, termination is possible. However, the greater the interest of the terminated party in the continuation of the agreement, the more should be offered by the terminating party.

Compensation for termination

What the terminating party must offer depends on the circumstance of the case. The circumstances may require that

  • There must be a substantial ground to terminate the agreement and/or
  • The terminating party must observe a certain notice period and/or
  • A financial compensation or damages must be paid.

Substantial ground

Though termination is in principle possible (whether or not with notice period and/or financial compensation), sometimes the circumstances may require that there must be a substantial ground. This may be the case if the terminated party suffers financial loss, for example because it is not possible to recoup specific or recently made investments.

Substantial grounds for the terminating party may include: policy changes, non-performance of the terminated party or external circumstances such as, for instance, a trade ban. In these cases the continuing performance agreement can be terminated, even if this sometimes has far-reaching negative consequences for the terminated party. For example, breach of contract, such as the sale of competing products in contradiction to the agreement, may even be a reason to terminate the contract without notice and compensation.

Notice period

When one party has invested a lot in the contractual relationship, it can be unreasonable for the other party to suddenly terminate the agreement. The duration of the agreement plays a role in the determination of the notice period. A long trade relationship cannot be terminated just like that, but can also mean that the terminated party has had sufficient time to recoup its investments.

A notice period can also be reasonable if there is a dependency relationship in which the terminating party is a large or the only trading partner of the other party. A notice period gives the other party time to find a new source of income. If, on the other hand, there is no dependency relationship, this may be an indication that no (long) notice period is required.

Financial compensation or damages

The payment of financial compensation or damages usually occurs if the contract has been terminated in a valid manner, but for example the notice period does not sufficiently compensate the interests of the terminated party. As it is in principle possible to terminate the continuing performance agreement, in the case of an already terminated agreement compensation will be chosen rather than an extension of the notice period.

Our advice

  • Take into account the notice period or have an investigation carried out whether that is necessary in your case, for instance, if you have a substantial ground to terminate the agreement with immediate effect.
  • Determine what your financial interests are if you are dealing with a terminating party.

More information?

Would you like advice about the termination of an agreement? Would you like to learn more about (continuing performance) agreements? Please contact us:

    We process the personal data above with your permission. You can withdraw your permission at any time. For more information please see our Privacy Statement.

    Related publications

    1 January 2026: Wwft prohibits cash payments of 3,000 euros or more

    As of 1 January 2026, the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Prevention) Act (Wwft) will change. Cash payments of EUR 3,000 or more will then be prohibited. What does this mean for the retail sector and the art trade?

    Read more

    Concurrence of lease agreement and franchise agreement

    A franchise agreement is often linked to an agreement for the lease of business premises. What happens if the franchisor and franchisee have a conflict? Does the lease agreement remain in force if there are problems with the franchise?

    Read more

    5 legal tips for managers of nonprofit organizations

    Managing a nonprofit organization requires not only idealism and dedication, but also a sensible approach to legal opportunities and risks. This ensures that the charity is future-proof. What are the important issues that need to be properly addressed?

    Read more

    Prevent the AI Act from taking you by surprise: how to limit the risks

    Almost all companies now use some form of AI. This means that they may be subject to the prohibitions and regulations set out in the European AI Act. How can you ensure that you comply with these rules?

    Read more

    11 November 2025: Wtta (Labour Supply Act) passed

    The new Labour Supply Act (Wtta) imposes stricter requirements on temporary employment agencies, payroll companies and secondment agencies. But the Wtta also has major consequences for companies that use their services. What does this mean for their personnel policy and administration?

    Read more

    Drugs and alcohol at work: 4 recent rulings

    Employees who consume alcohol and drugs during work or who want to work under the influence remain a problem for employers. What measures can you take against this? Are you allowed to test an employee if you suspect they are under the influence?

    Read more