Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55New rules apply to a prospectus for the offer of shares or bonds from 21 July 2019 onwards. Then the prospectus must contain a risk analysis, a clear summary, essential information about the share and the company issuing the shares and it must be drawn up in Dutch or English. The company and the directors can be held liable of the information is incorrect or misleading.
From 21 July, because of the Prospectus Directive (Implementation) Act there will be new rules for the prospectus which must be published when securities are offered to the public (IPO) or are admitted to the trade on a regulated market (listing). What requirements does a prospectus have to meet – based on the (new) law – to obtain the approval of the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM)? These are the most significant requirements:
All material risks for investors which are specific to the issuer must be included in the prospectus. They are subdivided in categories and per category the most significant risks must be named first. Simply mentioning a risk is not enough; it must be explained why this particular risk is run and what the likelihood of it being run is.
The prospectus must include a summary consisting of four departments with essential information about:
The summary must be easy to read, with brief, concise texts that are easy to understand for investors. Technical terms are not allowed.
No one can be held liable on the basis of the summary or a translation thereof alone. However, there is an exception to this rule if the summary, when read together with other parts of the prospectus, is:
The information to be included in the prospectus shall include, inter alia, the following:
The prospectus has to meet the language requirements of the country in which the securities are offered or listed on the stock exchange. If that offer or listing takes place in the Netherlands, the prospectus must be drawn up in Dutch or English. It is therefore possible to draw up the prospectus in English only.
The prospectus must be written in understandable language (similar to plain English) and the prospectus must be put together consistently and understandably. Reference tables have to be included that indicate exactly where the required information can be found that was not included in the prospectus.
If a prospectus contains wrong or misleading information, an investor who has been adversely affected may hold the issuer, or even its directors, liable. In addition, the AFM may suspend or prohibit the offer of securities if the Prospectus Regulation is infringed. Under certain conditions, the AFM may also suspend or prohibit trading in securities or trading on a trade platform.
Would you like to have a prospectus checked? Or do you want more information about prospectus liability or director’s liability? Please contact us:
For the interpretation of articles of association the court uses other rules than for shareholders’ agreements. What are these rules? What consequences does this difference have for what you have to include in the articles of association and the shareholders’ agreement?
What is a shareholders’ agreement? What can be governed by a shareholders’ agreement? And why do you need a shareholders’ agreement if the company also has articles of association?
An earn-out in the event of a company takeover offers opportunities and risks. The former director and major shareholder remains involved in the company and part of the purchase price remains dependent on future performance. What aspects are important here?
Many companies do not have a works council, even though they should. When is it mandatory to establish one? What are the advantages of a works council? What are the consequences if your company does not have a works council?
A director under the articles of association is appointed by an appointment decision by an authorised body. What might be the consequences if this decision was not established in writing?
The franchise agreement and the distribution agreement are very similar, but there are also important differences. What are the consequences if you conclude a franchise agreement when it is actually a distribution agreement or vice versa? How can you avoid this misunderstanding?