Paul Russell

senior partner

Paul is a highly experienced, creative and tenacious litigator

paul.russell@russell.nl
+31 20 301 55 55

Reinier Russell

managing partner

Reinier advises national and international companies

reinier.russell@russell.nl
+31 20 301 55 55

Artworks as means of payment: What if a work of art is a fake?

Publication date 15 december 2017

As the value of art is rising more rapidly than inflation, artworks have become an attractive means of payment. What can you do if the artworks you purchased turn out to be fake and you have been paid in counterfeits?

Kunst als betaalmiddel

Three recent decisions by the Amsterdam District Court regarding the sale of a collection worth millions of Euros give more clarity.

In January 2014, the owner of an art collection sells it via a holding company for EUR 1,636,000 to All Art Initiatives B.V. (AAI) to pay off part of his debts to the group company to which AAI belongs. In January 2013, the collection was appraised at EUR 3,759,100 on behalf of the owner. AAI seems to have made a good buy with the collection including works by Piet Mondrian, Max Liebermann, Mary Cassatt, Henri Toulouse-Lautrec, August Macke, Jan Sluijters, George Hendrik Breitner, Isaac Israëls, Maximilien Luce, Edouard Vuillard, James Ensor and Constant Permeke.

Fake art

When in 2015 two experts commissioned by AAI examined the art collection they concluded that a large number of the artworks were fake. Thereafter, AAI required documentation regarding the authenticity of the artworks from the original owner, such as certificates of authenticity, purchase invoices and catalogues raisonnés. The original owner only produced taxation reports that said nothing about the authenticity of the artworks, which did not satisfy AAI.

Damage and warranty

AAI then asked the court to terminate or annul the purchase agreement, because of fraud or error, or to compensate the damage because of non-conformity. As the owner should have known this, not just the holding company – which held the practically worthless collection – but also he himself is liable for the claim. As error was excluded in the agreement as a reason for termination and there was no conclusive evidence for fraud, only compensation due to non-conformity is dealt with in the proceedings.

The original owner argues that no warranty for authenticity was given and that AAI, as a professional buyer, should have performed an appraisal. The court does not go along with this. AAI could rely upon three appraisal reports the owner submitted to them prior to the purchase. In addition, the owner had guaranteed the value of the artworks.

Experts

As the opinions of the parties’ appraisers differ with regard to the value of the collection, the court decides to appoint its own expert. AAI claimed that the artworks were fakes and thus has to prove that this statement is correct. Therefore, it is not the task of the expert to determine that the artworks are authentic but to view whether it can be said with a great degree of certainty that the artworks are a fake. Due to this requirement the artworks will be considered as “authentic” more quickly.

Amount of damage

After an examination of 127 works of art, it turned out that one third was certain to be forged and the major part of the other works had been overvalued. The collection was not worth EUR 3,759,100, but only EUR 906,700. And that is a lot less than the amount of EUR 1,636,000 the collection was bought for. The seller, the holding company, therefore has to compensate the damage AAI incurred. That amounts to EUR 755,300, which is the difference between the purchase price and the actual value of the artworks.

As the art collection was the major asset of the holding company, it will be difficult to obtain compensation. The Court does not consider it proved that the director of the holding company consciously harmed AAI and therefore only the holding company has to cover the damage and legal costs, and costs for attachment incurred.

Prevent fake art sales

The problems were caused because AAI had the collection thoroughly assessed after the purchase instead of before to it. This could be prevented by an upfront investigation regarding authenticity and provenance of artworks. Russell Advocaten will gladly help you finding independent experts and drafting a sales agreement that provides you with the opportunity to recover the costs in the event of forgeries. Please contact us:

    We process the personal data above with your permission. You can withdraw your permission at any time. For more information please see our Privacy Statement.

    Related publications

    Art and Law: Forgery – prevention vs cure

    What exactly is art forgery? How can you prevent to buy a forged work of art? And what can you do when it turns out you have unexpectedly bought a fake artwork?

    Read more

    Art and law: Art dealer held accountable for incorrect information by an Internet auction house on the provenance of a forged sculpture

    How can you prevent, as an art seller, that you will be held liable when a person who acts on your behalf gives incorrect information on a work of art?

    Read more

    1 January 2026: Wwft prohibits cash payments of 3,000 euros or more

    As of 1 January 2026, the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Prevention) Act (Wwft) will change. Cash payments of EUR 3,000 or more will then be prohibited. What does this mean for the retail sector and the art trade?

    Read more

    5 legal tips for managers of nonprofit organizations

    Managing a nonprofit organization requires not only idealism and dedication, but also a sensible approach to legal opportunities and risks. This ensures that the charity is future-proof. What are the important issues that need to be properly addressed?

    Read more

    Importing art from outside EU will become more difficult

    Since 28 June 2025, a new EU regulation requires anyone wishing to import cultural goods into the EU to have an import licence or submit an importer’s declaration. When is which type of document required? How does it affect art dealers, galleries, auction houses and collectors, both inside and outside the EU?

    Read more

    Drugs and alcohol at work: 4 recent rulings

    Employees who consume alcohol and drugs during work or who want to work under the influence remain a problem for employers. What measures can you take against this? Are you allowed to test an employee if you suspect they are under the influence?

    Read more