Reinier advises national and international companies
reinier.russell@russell.nl +31 20 301 55 55In principle, it is possible to terminate continuing performance agreements, even if the parties have made no arrangements to that end and the law does not provide for a termination arrangement. Sometimes the circumstances do require that there must also be substantial grounds for giving notice, possibly in combination with a notice period and the payment of financial compensation.

Continuing performance agreements are characterized by having effect for a longer period of time. A continuing performance agreement does not require a one-off performance, but rather successive or continuous performance. In most continuing performance agreements parties have provided for a termination arrangement. If the parties have not agreed on a termination arrangement, a statutory arrangement may apply, as applies to rental or agency agreements. In addition, continuing performance agreements can be concluded for a fixed period. In principle, these agreements end on the agreed date. But what if the agreement does not include a termination regulation and there cannot be fallen back on statutory arrangements either?
Whether a continuing performance agreement without termination arrangement can be terminated depends on whether termination is reasonable in the given situation. Various factors play a role in this.
In the majority of cases where both the law and the agreement do not provide for a termination arrangement, termination is possible. However, the greater the interest of the terminated party in the continuation of the agreement, the more should be offered by the terminating party.
What the terminating party must offer depends on the circumstance of the case. The circumstances may require that
Though termination is in principle possible (whether or not with notice period and/or financial compensation), sometimes the circumstances may require that there must be a substantial ground. This may be the case if the terminated party suffers financial loss, for example because it is not possible to recoup specific or recently made investments.
Substantial grounds for the terminating party may include: policy changes, non-performance of the terminated party or external circumstances such as, for instance, a trade ban. In these cases the continuing performance agreement can be terminated, even if this sometimes has far-reaching negative consequences for the terminated party. For example, breach of contract, such as the sale of competing products in contradiction to the agreement, may even be a reason to terminate the contract without notice and compensation.
When one party has invested a lot in the contractual relationship, it can be unreasonable for the other party to suddenly terminate the agreement. The duration of the agreement plays a role in the determination of the notice period. A long trade relationship cannot be terminated just like that, but can also mean that the terminated party has had sufficient time to recoup its investments.
A notice period can also be reasonable if there is a dependency relationship in which the terminating party is a large or the only trading partner of the other party. A notice period gives the other party time to find a new source of income. If, on the other hand, there is no dependency relationship, this may be an indication that no (long) notice period is required.
The payment of financial compensation or damages usually occurs if the contract has been terminated in a valid manner, but for example the notice period does not sufficiently compensate the interests of the terminated party. As it is in principle possible to terminate the continuing performance agreement, in the case of an already terminated agreement compensation will be chosen rather than an extension of the notice period.
Would you like advice about the termination of an agreement? Would you like to learn more about (continuing performance) agreements? Please contact us:
As of 1 January 2026, the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Prevention) Act (Wwft) will change. Cash payments of EUR 3,000 or more will then be prohibited. What does this mean for the retail sector and the art trade?
A franchise agreement is often linked to an agreement for the lease of business premises. What happens if the franchisor and franchisee have a conflict? Does the lease agreement remain in force if there are problems with the franchise?
Managing a nonprofit organization requires not only idealism and dedication, but also a sensible approach to legal opportunities and risks. This ensures that the charity is future-proof. What are the important issues that need to be properly addressed?
Almost all companies now use some form of AI. This means that they may be subject to the prohibitions and regulations set out in the European AI Act. How can you ensure that you comply with these rules?
The new Labour Supply Act (Wtta) imposes stricter requirements on temporary employment agencies, payroll companies and secondment agencies. But the Wtta also has major consequences for companies that use their services. What does this mean for their personnel policy and administration?
Employees who consume alcohol and drugs during work or who want to work under the influence remain a problem for employers. What measures can you take against this? Are you allowed to test an employee if you suspect they are under the influence?