Publication date: 24 March 2016
On 21 April 2016, Paul W.L. Russell, LL.M. will be industry expert panel member of the 9th Art & Finance Conference of Deloitte co-organized with the Van Gogh Museum, that will take place at the Amsterdam Concertgebouw.
The unprecedented development of the art market over the past few years has resulted in the ‘financialization’ of the art market. Fine art is now not only seen as an object of pleasure but also as a new alternative asset class providing interesting business opportunities.
As a lawyer, Paul W.L. Russell has many decades of experience with art-related cases. On the panel, he will mainly deal with the protection of the integrity of fine art collections from potential threats, such as forgery, theft and war-looted art. The Art & Finance Conference is organized each year for collectors and managers of fine art collections, such as affluent private individuals, foundations and institutional investors.
Other important topics of the Conference will cover how to make a collection of fine art more visible, why and how to turn your fine art collection into a working asset, and how to transfer a fine art collection to the next generation(s).
The Art & Finance Conference is organized in cooperation with the Van Gogh Museum. The programme will finish with a guided tour through the Van Gogh Museum and drinks. Register and see programme details at: https://www2.deloitte.com/lu/en/pages/art-finance/events/2016-art-and-finance-conference.html.
Russell Advocaten has for the 17th consecutive year in a row been included in The Legal 500. We are pleased with the recognition for the quality of our legal services by experts and clients. Please read what they say about us:read on
The Dutch restitution policy returns to its original principles and is rightly becoming more generous. Cases that have already been settled can also be resubmitted. What will change in the policy?read on
The sale of a drawing by Rubens, owned by Princess Christina, at an auction in New York caused great indignation and a discussion about the policy for cultural heritage in the Netherlands. This resulted in two advice committees, the Pechtold Committee and the Buma Committee. The latter has issued an interim opinion, that, if adopted, could have serious consequences for art collectors and art dealers in the Netherlands.read on
Russell Advocaten noticed in its proceedings before the Dutch Restitutions Committee that the committee increasingly attached importance to the interest of the current owners. This is contrary to the Washington Principles. The committee appointed to evaluate Dutch restitution policy agrees with us in its “Striving for Justice” report.read on
Even if the Restitutions Committee recommends to return looted art, it is not certain that the work of art will actually return to its rightful claimants. It could be that the work of art is irreplaceable and indispensable to Dutch cultural heritage and may not leave the Netherlands.read on
At the online symposium of the Vereniging Kunst Cultuur Recht on the Heritage Act and the protection of cultural goods, Paul W.L. Russell, LL.M. threw a few stones into the pond. How useful are protective measures to keep cultural heritage in the Netherlands without making underlying purchase funds directly available? Is the designation procedure necessary?read on
The Rijksmuseum Twenthe paid almost EUR 3 million into a fake bank account. Hackers had taken over the correspondence between the museum and an art dealer on the purchase of a painting by Constable. Who pays for the damage? The museum or the art dealer?read on